Last week Marcy and I wrote a lot about the Senate Armed Services Committee torture disclosures and about Physicians for Human Rights' report on torture's enduring effects on its victims. Today, Scott Shane of the New York Times reports on a new call from practically the entire foreign policy community to get out of the torture business.
A bipartisan group of 200 former government officials, retired generals and religious leaders plans to issue a statement on Wednesday calling for a presidential order to outlaw some interrogation and detention practices used by the Bush administration over the last six years.
The executive order they seek would commit the government to using only interrogation methods that the United States would find acceptable if used by another country against American soldiers or civilians.
It would also outlaw secret detentions, used since 2001 by the Central Intelligence Agency, and prohibit the transfer of prisoners to countries that use torture or cruel treatment. The C.I.A. has allowed terrorism suspects to be taken to such countries.
Among the signatories: Bush Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and State Dept. counsel William Taft IV (!); Reagan SecState George Schultz; Clinton SecStates Christopher and Albright; Clinton national-security adviser Tony Lake; Carter/Clinton SecDefs Brown, Perry and Cohen; and about 200 more. But would torture victim John McCain enact such an executive order if elected? Full text of the letter -- jointly issued by National Religious Campaign Against Torture, Evangelicals for Human Rights, and the Center for Victims of Torture -- after the jump.
Declaration of Principles for a Presidential Executive Order
On Prisoner Treatment, Torture and CrueltyThough we come from a variety of backgrounds and walks of life, we agree that the use of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment against prisoners is immoral, unwise, and un-American. In our effort to secure ourselves, we have resorted to tactics which do not work, which endanger US personnel abroad, which discourage political, military, and intelligence cooperation from our allies, and which ultimately do not enhance our security.
Our President must lead us by our core principles. We must be better than our enemies, and our treatment of prisoners captured in the battle against terrorism must reflect our character and values as Americans.
Therefore, we believe the President of the United States should issue an Executive Order that provides as follows:
The “Golden Rule.” We will not authorize or use any methods of interrogation that we would not find acceptable if used against Americans, be they civilians or soldiers.
One national standard. We will have one national standard for all US personnel and agencies for the interrogation and treatment of prisoners. Currently, the best expression of that standard is the US Army Field Manual, which will be used until any other interrogation technique has been approved based on the Golden Rule principle.
The rule of law. We will acknowledge all prisoners to our courts or the International Red Cross. We will in no circumstance hold persons in secret prisons or engage in disappearances. In all cases, prisoners will have the opportunity to prove their innocence in ways that fully conform to American principles of fairness.
Duty to protect. We acknowledge our historical commitment to end the use of torture and cruelty in the world. The US will not transfer any person to countries that use torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.
Checks and balances. Congress and the courts play an invaluable role in protecting the values and institutions of our nation and must have and will have access to the information they need to be fully informed about our detention and interrogation policies.
Clarity and accountability. All US personnel—whether soldiers or intelligence staff—deserve the certainty that they are implementing policy that complies fully with the law. Henceforth all US officials who authorize, implement, or fail in their duty to prevent the use of torture and ill-treatment of prisoners will be held accountable, regardless of rank or position.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight


Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
Great news, Spencer — though the fact that govt leaders and religious folks come out against torture is a sad commentary on what it takes to make “news” these days.
A couple links to add to your post:
National Religious Campaign Against Torture
Evangelicals for Human Rights
Center for Victims of Torture
The folks at CVT are incredible people, who have been doing incredible work for decades. It’s sad to see that they have to join in a call to get our own government to quit driving up their business.
Last April, while McCain was on his “forgotten places tour,” I suggested that he drop in to see the folks at CVT, to get a reminder of what the United States historically stands for and what it stands against.
Yet another opportunity to name a blog “Back Crack And S.Ackerman” wasted.
It would also outlaw secret detentions, used since 2001 by the Central Intelligence Agency, and prohibit the transfer of prisoners to countries that use torture or cruel treatment. The C.I.A. has allowed terrorism suspects to be taken to such countries.
This missing has been my big gripe with everything tabled so far.
I don’t give a toss if you stop waterboarding prisoners if you’re still shipping them to Syria and Egypt to be tortured to death like you have been since the 90s, and nobody else should either.
Prohibiting US servicemen and the CIA from engaging in this while outsourcing it amounts to nothing more than enshrining deniability for it into law. It’s no different than Rumsfeld citing camera phones as the reason for the whole Abu Ghraib scandal.
But then again, this practice was always prohibited. Let’s see how much of a difference this makes, if anything.
Thx Attackerman.
The biggest surprise for me on this list was George Schultz (Bechtel board member, former mentor to Condi Rice). When someone involved with WINEP objects to BushCheney torture policies, you know the world has shifted its axis a bit.