Via a friend who'd prefer to remain anonymous, check out who introduced/sponsored the latest version of the Constitutional Marriage Amendment:
110th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. J. RES. 43Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
JUNE 25, 2008
Mr. WICKER (for himself, Mr. VITTER, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. THUNE, and Mr. SHELBY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:
"ARTICLE —
" Section 1. This article may be cited as the Marriage Protection Amendment."
" Section 2. Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman.".
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight


Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
I assume they will be taking a wide stance on the issue.
Given Addington’s parsing of the constitution yesterday, I can’t resist . . .
If only a man and a woman get to be married, in the whole United States, what’s going to happen to all the other men and women who are already married?
That blasted Unitary Marriage theory . . .
surreal
These folks take hypocrisy to an art form
What do the homos need marraige for ?
Get yourselves a gun and form a militia. You can have all the soul crushing misery of marraige and none of the hassle of a divorce court. And a gun.