I write a series for my franchise, The Washington Independent, called "The Rise of the Counterinsurgents." It’s about this ascendant movement of defense theorist-practitioners who, natch, work on counterinsurgency. And I’ve noticed something that I was really surprised no one else was reporting, given how much attention counterinsurgency was getting: So many of the leading counterinsurgents are women.
That’s pretty amazing, when you think about it. Defense is a really male-dominated field, to understate matters. Yet women aren’t just equal partners in COIN. Often they’re leaders. It seemed worth a piece devoted to giving this development its due, and so here’s the seventh installment in "The Rise of the Counterinsurgents."
In a series of interviews, leading woman counterinsurgents, and some of their male colleagues, discussed how the unconventional approach to military operations calls for skills in academic and military fields that have become open to women in recent decades. Others contend that counterinsurgency’s impulse for collaborative leadership speaks to women’s "emotional IQ," in the words of one prominent woman counterinsurgent. Another explanation has to do with coincidence: the military’s post-Vietnam outreach to women has matured at the same time as counterinsurgency became an unexpected national imperative.
"It is not that women are ‘better’ at this stuff than men," Davidson said, "it is just that the problems associated with populations involve non-military skill sets and knowledge from fields where women have traditionally been better represented than they have been in the military."
Login Here




2 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
As I’ve said previously, mighty impressive.
Did you have a fav part?
Need to bone up on human emergence theories to explain this; makes perfect sense to me after reading “Changes of Mind: A Holonomic Theory of the Evolution of Consciousness” by Prof. Jenny Wade.
For reasons biochemical, physical, what have you, most normal adults tend to manifest along two different states of consciousness: affiliative and achievement oriented. After reading the descriptions of these states in Wade’s book, it was easy for me to see that there may be a gender bias in manifestation of conscious states (shorter and far too glibly, women really are from Venus and men from Mars…).
Affiliatives tend to see connections, relationships between people, things, events; achievement-oriented find value in benchmarks, measures, goals. Granted, states of consciousness can be fluid and humans can migrate back and forth between them, but where does any human spend the bulk of their waking conscious hours? For example: my spouse, an engineer by education and a manager by profession, is a golf freak who can tell me that the 9th hole on a course he played 15 years ago in a different state is a par 3 dogleg right with two sand traps and a water hazard; what state do you think he lives in, in terms of consciousness?
So based on gender we may live in different states of consciousness, and one gender tends to be far more likely to waging linear war, the other, well…remember Albert Einstein’s famous quote, “No problem is ever solved by the same consciousness that created it” –?
Seems obvious to me, but then I live in a state of consciousness that can make the connection.