<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Evil Is Strong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/08/13/strongeralqaeda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/08/13/strongeralqaeda/</link>
	<description>Just another Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:52:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kilo</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/08/13/strongeralqaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/08/13/strongeralqaeda/#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Spencer, you should recognize this pattern from Iraq: the enemy uses technology far more effectively than our government does &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Er…. no. Effective use wouldn’t have included use of mass casualty attacks to alienate themselves from their support base whice pretty much resulted in them using their own knives to slit their own throats in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Spencer, you should recognize this pattern from Iraq: the enemy uses technology far more effectively than our government does </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Er…. no. Effective use wouldn’t have included use of mass casualty attacks to alienate themselves from their support base whice pretty much resulted in them using their own knives to slit their own throats in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshua.foust</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/08/13/strongeralqaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>joshua.foust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/08/13/strongeralqaeda/#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It means we used to be making strides in degrading AQ’s capabilities, but have run out of ways to do that. Spencer, you should recognize this pattern from Iraq: the enemy uses technology far more effectively than our government does, so they can decentralize into untraceable cells while vastly speeding up their OODA loop. Suddenly you face an enemy that can switch tactics, methods, and organization faster than your agency can identify them, leading to operational paralysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Put into terms I unfortunately picked up from Alvin Toffler, the U.S. government is a big, inflexible, industrial, “Second Wave” beast, while Al-Qaeda is a small, networked, highly flexible, “Third Wave” organization, and in terms of organization remarkably superior.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is why even refocusing on COIN at the division level won’t really address terrorism. Insurgency is not our “real” problem, yet institutional changes are the last off the drawing table. (As one example, we’ve been talking about ’social network effects’ and “effects based operations’ since at least the early 80s, yet it takes until years after we invade Iraq and Afghanistan for these ideas to make their ways into planning — the government itself is just fundamentally mis-structured to address new security concerns.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It means we used to be making strides in degrading AQ’s capabilities, but have run out of ways to do that. Spencer, you should recognize this pattern from Iraq: the enemy uses technology far more effectively than our government does, so they can decentralize into untraceable cells while vastly speeding up their OODA loop. Suddenly you face an enemy that can switch tactics, methods, and organization faster than your agency can identify them, leading to operational paralysis.</p>
<p>Put into terms I unfortunately picked up from Alvin Toffler, the U.S. government is a big, inflexible, industrial, “Second Wave” beast, while Al-Qaeda is a small, networked, highly flexible, “Third Wave” organization, and in terms of organization remarkably superior.</p>
<p>This is why even refocusing on COIN at the division level won’t really address terrorism. Insurgency is not our “real” problem, yet institutional changes are the last off the drawing table. (As one example, we’ve been talking about ’social network effects’ and “effects based operations’ since at least the early 80s, yet it takes until years after we invade Iraq and Afghanistan for these ideas to make their ways into planning — the government itself is just fundamentally mis-structured to address new security concerns.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macaquerman</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/08/13/strongeralqaeda/comment-page-1/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>macaquerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/08/13/strongeralqaeda/#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What does any of this mean?&lt;br /&gt;
Al-Qaeda just as strong as it was in 2005? How strong is that? Compared to 2001?&lt;br /&gt;
And where is it’s strength? It it as strong amongst the Arabs?&lt;br /&gt;
Or is it mostly confined to the precincts of the Pashtun?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does any of this mean?<br />
Al-Qaeda just as strong as it was in 2005? How strong is that? Compared to 2001?<br />
And where is it’s strength? It it as strong amongst the Arabs?<br />
Or is it mostly confined to the precincts of the Pashtun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
