There are many, many, many reasons to be concerned about Sarah Palin’s fitness for vice president. A scurrilous and unfounded rumor about her family is absolutely not one of them. Same goes for her appearance. As progressives, we have an absolute obligation to defend Palin when it comes to the same kind of private crap that the right put on Clinton or on John Edwards or any number of others. Some flimsy discussion about "hypocrisy" is a fig leaf for exploitative opportunism. Far better than I can say it, here’s Megan Carpentier’s excellent post:
And when liberals and progressives pounce on rumors like this one about Trig’s "true" parentage — whether or not it is true, which I’m pretty sure it’s not — or rumors about Republican politicians’ sexuality (in the absence of crimes committed) we are conceding that conservatives are right, and personal choices do qualify or disqualify one for certain aspects of participation in public life and this democracy. We are accepting their terms, their definitions of appropriate private behavior, and attempting to use those definitions to defeat their candidates. And once we do that, even if we do "take down" Sarah Palin or whatever Republican candidate in order to protect gay rights or reproductive rights or educational rights, then we’ve lost on those issues anyway because we’ve conceded that the underpinnings to the Republican positions on those issues is valid.
So, please, stop.
Indeed. (But not heh-indeed!)
Update: Yeah yeah so Bristol Palin is pregnant, so what. Megan continues to outdo herself:
I can only imagine the courage it took for Bristol to go to her parents, pregnant at 17, and lay out one of the most personal aspects of human life — her sexual activities — and the consequences of those activities and that she was choosing to keep the child despite the high probability of political embarrassment that would be laid at her mother’s doorstep. And all of that was before her mother was about to be made VP. She didn’t by any means choose the easy path here, and everyone probably fully expected that this big reveal would happen at some point rather soon. That it has doesn’t make my bile rise any less with every post I read about how, ha-ha, look what happens when you promote abstinence. Once again, even for this great lover of Schandenfreude, my lips are curling in a little disgust with the glee shown by some of my political compatriots at this news.
Login Here




4 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
As you know by now, the rumors of Bristol Palin’s pregnancy were false, or at least premature.
Their press release ends:
Right, like McCain’s jokes about Chelsea Clinton
What courage? Even the most inattentive mother is going to notice that her daughter is pregnant or that there’s another mouth to feed at the table. Leave Bristol out of it but this says volumes about Mccain’s and Palin’s judgement. If Palin knew her daughter was five months gone, why didn’t she mention it to Mccain? They could have finessed it when they announced his pick. If Palin didn’t know, why not?
great post, Spencer
Oh, please: so there are some fringe bloggers raising questions about baby Trig. And that’s some sort of tragedy for our time?
Want to know why folks are talking about it? Because there’s all sorts of weird shit going on in the backstory. Bristol was out of school for *eight* months? For mononucleosis? BS. And Sarah was in Texas for a political affair when her FUCKING water broke? So she got on a commercial flight and flew back to Alaska? Then on to her local hospital? Sorry, but there’s just no fucking way that happened. Anyone who thinks otherwise has *clearly* never been pregnant and had their water break. It’s just beyond laughable.
Is it something the Obama campaign should stay the fuck away from? Absolutely.
Is the general public wondering about these questions somehow illegitimate and misogynistic? What the fuck ever…