Melissa, Josh and Baratunde have truly excellent posts cataloging the McCain-Palin campaign’s descent into outright bigotry and Nixonlandia. Earlier this week I suggested that the progressive counteroffensive should aim to destroy McCain’s reputation for all time. After an evening discussing this with friends over beers, I’m wondering about the logistics of such a campaign.
Remember in 2000 when McCain refused to call for the removal of the Confederate flag from the South Carolina statehouse? It was a blatant play to the ugliest aspects of American politics, an unsubtly coded attempt to identify himself with white resentment. But what was even more astonishing was what happened after he lost the GOP primary. Here’s CNN from April 19, 2000:
Former GOP presidential candidate John McCain called for the removal of the Confederate battle flag from atop the South Carolina Statehouse on Wednesday, acknowledging that his refusal to take such a stance during his primary battle for the Palmetto State was a "sacrifice of principle for personal ambition."
This was pretty widely hailed as a triumph of straight talk. McCain admitted such transparent cynicism! What a breath of fresh air! Now, there’s another way of looking at this moment. One that a less, frankly, white group of trail reporters might have picked up on: despite finding the flag personally offensive — because it is a symbol of racial subjugation; and treason in the interest of white supremacy — McCain didn’t mind exploiting it. He didn’t mind aggravating the most noxious division in America if it served his ambition.
White privilege helps explain why the press gave McCain a pass. But there’s also a simple explanation making up a large part of it: proximity and access to the man made much of the national press believe he was fundamentally decent. It’s an odd act of self-loathing when you think about it. All it takes is one man’s attention to get you to melt in his gaze, to kick your heels up on the tire swing and laugh. It’s like your parents told you: displaying self-respect will generate respect from others. What reporters took from McCain as warmth was actually exploitation.
Is there any reason to believe this episode won’t happen again? That when McCain loses — when the forces of progressivism stand up in this country against the demagoguery, the venality, the manufactured outrage and the racism of his campaign — he won’t make another staged act of contrition? My friends, I accepted the advice of those who had so badly misled our country all these years, and I said some things on the campaign trail that did not reflect my true feelings toward President Obama. It was a sacrifice of principle for personal ambition… What would stop the press from once again believing their perception of the Real McCain is the real McCain, against the evidence of his behavior in two presidential elections?
The answer may be: nothing. It may be that this is just the way the rules work, and the rules aren’t fair and there’s one set of standards for John McCain and another for everyone else.
But there’s only one thing that can possibly stop this from happening: you. Every single time McCain is quoted in the press as he slithers back to his pathetic senatorial career, put his words of the last few days in everything you write. Let what he says in the next four weeks become the lead paragraph of his obituary. Never let this be seen as a deviation. Let it stand as the true measure of the man who told us that Courage Matters — the truth of his character, revealed through his behavior during the race he chose to be his defining moment. Do not allow him to disavow the course that he’s chosen. Let him be known forever as what he’s chosen to be in the twilight of his career: a brazen, craven coward.



63 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
McPalin going down down down in a burning ring of fire
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2iv_E-Fn9E
When McCain announced Palin in Dayton Ohio I thought he looked like he was in shock. At that point I do not think he realized how bad it could get.
Makes one wonder just who picked Palin out. Makes you wonder if they wanted McCain to lose
1That’s some kind of coward!!
2Worry less about McFrankenstein and more about his lipsticked monster.
3What do you mean by “the logistic of the campaign”?
Thanks muchly for the link, SA.
“Let him be known forever as what he’s chosen to be in the twilight of his career: a brazen, craven coward.” — Totally. In fact, I wrote back in Feb. ‘06: “Let us never cease to speak of McCain with the firm conviction that he is an asshole, a man who will lovingly embrace the cretin whose political machine called his wife a junky and his daughter an illegitimate black child.” And I’ve been doing as much ever since.
After what you do
I can’t on
can’t stay on
His current descent into the mud sort of reminds me of “Othello”. Well, except for the part about how Othello was a supremely honorable man at the beginning of the play. And Othello never crashed 5 planes. But otherwise, the similarities are eerie.
After what you’ve done
McFlame-out is wasted and he can’t find his way home.
Here in Austin our local news was going to have the not lovely Karen Hughes on evening news to give her opinion on tonight’s debate. I ask: Who cares. And must add that I do not know what she said because you know I didn’t watch. After all, she helped give us the lying W. Why would they did her up?
Johnny McScreamerAtTrees thinks the Confederate flag is a terrific symbol of America’s heritage? Is he effing nuts? What an asshole.
Bingo. But that has always been John McCain if you scratched the surface gloss of bullshit.
“there’s one set of standards for John McCain and another for everyone else.” SA
There’s the foundation of their ideaology.
Compassionate conservative my a$$!
If McShame wants to continue with his shit I think Obama’s campaign should link McShame to all his felon buddies starting with James Helmsley
Cindy’s daddy???
Yes
I wonder, how many times must a person sacrifice principle for personal ambition before it is generally acknowledged that that person always sacrifices principle for personal ambition? And that, by implication, that person probably never had any principles to begin with?
Bah hahahahaha! Chris Matthews was just talking with the crowd of Obama supporters and then asked, “Where are the McCain supporters? They were here a minute ago”, and then one guy in the audience said, “Just like Michigan, they left”. Bah hahahahahaha! Hysterical.
probably? probably probably never had any? I believe you mean “always lacked”
as in
“always lacked principles.”
You know he was an ‘abject failure’. Meaning there wasn’t one stage of his life where he was honorable. Shit, that stint in the jungle was his payment for him being a failure as a pilot. Don’t think that SOB didn’t lie every day for five years. Cuz he did! That has never changed.
Well this guy’s called out McCain 1989 and in Phoenix. So how does flyboy keep getting re elected?
My bold. That was back in Nineteen Eighty Nine!
I do like that crowd. very enthusiastic.
Check out C-SPAN’s Debate Hub:
http://debatehub.c-span.org/
We get to listen to people talking on the floor of the debate building. Very cool.
Yes they are! Always great to see. It gets me in da political mood. *g*
OK this is my third comment in a row, but I just had to say THANKS! That’s what I would like to know. How many passes on personal ambition does a “honorable” person get?
I picture both McCain and Palin fading away after they lose. He’s going to be furious about serving in the Senate minority with a president he detests. He’ll throw a tantrum or two, but people (especially in the media) won’t be listening.
He’ll feel constrained against retiring for family or health reasons because the Democratic governor would appoint a Dem to replace him, sealing up the 60 seats Dems would need to control the Senate. 2009 will find him exhausted, though, and generally pissed off at his fellow Republicans, so he may do so anyway. Count on it to be framed as heroic and mavericky, putting country first.
With the right timing, he could retire and compete against Bush for $50K and $100K speaking gigs to conservatives, but demand will be nowhere as strong as Bill Clinton’s in 2001.
Similarly, Palin will be reprimanded at home in December and January for Troopergate and tax evasion. If she wants national prominence ever again, it will come only by reinventing herself outside the political arena. Chances of a 2009 recall election are 50-50. Watch her and Todd land executive jobs related to the $40B pipeline project, maybe even lobbying in Juneau and DC.
Large numbers of Arizona wingnuts.
This has been another episode…
Nice one. McCrazy is so old that he doesn’t think anyone has a record of his BS! Again, f’n idiot!
I think it’s very democratic of Jane to let us talk about anything we want even on the satellite threads.
Ha!
I’m gettin’ ready.
Oh, please whomever god is in charge of debates,
Let it be Over!
Hell, yeah, he’ll bolt! That’s what he’s done his whole life. Fight or flight? Guess which one he subscribes to?
A wish expressed as a forecast.
I can’t bear to watch tonight; I’m too sick and tired of McCant’s puffy lying mug right now. Hopefully he won’t have a complete meltdown while I’m away.
CSPAN has a camera backstag running now at the debate for anyone interested.
Debate Hub
I understand the reflex not to watch.
But, whoa, what if, what if he does melt? No, I’m not that wacky. He’ll have the perfect “formula” to keep him sane..
I’m terribly needy, ’cause I don’t want to watch, but I will.
here’s what I’m having trouble with spence
I am led to believe that advocating secession is an act of sedition, is this correct?
even if we are entitled to advocate secession through free speech, why aren’t we pointing out;
“palin’s husband didn’t even want to be an American until his wife became a candidate for the vice presidency, I am not comfortable with a man who doesn’t want to be an American that close to our governments highest secrets”
or something along that order
They should have drug tests for candidates at this level.
I kind of think he has no shame, he will admonish himself and pal up to the democrats
this I guarantee
oooohhh! That’s great!
He can go out with Joe LIEberman and make their own little mavricky party. Fuckwads!
They should have drug tests for candidates at this level.
I agree – and I’m serious.
Oh demi, I can’t wait,
the chance to watch the meltdown live and on teeVee: Priceless.
shameless bleg for recipes
Beyond butter, what do you do to your popcorn?
These younger adults on and off campus need to be thanked whenever possible. They have come out strong.
Me too. That wasn’t snark.
The Pillow Talk Express
Oh hell, Mittens is spinning and lying yet again. on tweety’s show.
I’m TELLING you elliot, you MUST top your popcorn with olive oil instead of butter, YUM
bush would have been disqualified
if you want to be technical it’s “did” and if you listen to the song for the last 54 years like I have you could hear “do”. But that’s just me.
Brain bleach, stat!
45
That’s no lie. He’s always been known for partying…big time partying. He’s just gotten old and can’t keep up with that little vice anymore.
the little vice has been replaced by the little voice inside his head
Elliott, thanks for posting this! I posted it too, but the moderator hasn’t posted it yet. Oh well. It’s fun to listen in on the people on the floor and watch the goings-on.
LOL! McStain is f’d up in the head too. Alcohol and brain trauma. Not a good combo.
oo what an image: Little Lindsey, John & Joe all tucked in together
You posted that link and it was moderated?
What’s to keep up with?
A newfound and consuming interest in traditional Indian crafts, I betcha!
The “little vice” will just be in her undisclosed location, sticking pins in an old homemade “doll” that one of her many “fans” will have sent her…
HA!
But, hey, they will no doubt be American flag pins, so it’s all good.
Excellent
I heard American Idol is trying to hire Palin as the host of the show. She is qualified
Yeah, I thought about that possibility.
I see him as chafing at the bit after all this time in the Senate, and owning up to the fact that the White House will not happen for him. Weary of Cindy’s control of the purse strings, and having to live with oversight of his income, ready to have unfettered cash of his own to drop in Vegas… especially if it includes being adored as an elder, heroic statesman at lucrative speeches. He can re-create his maverick persona, tell tasteless jokes, be a crotchety but wise curmudgeon.
Mark Twain would be his role model. Buried in debt and long out of the public eye, Twain embarked on a round-the-world speaking tour, reclaiming his public esteem as well as his financial viability.
Along the way, McCain would happily battle with Dubya and Bill Clinton for speaking gigs; he would write books and revel in winning more late-night TV invites than Bob Dole after the ‘96 election.
In his heart of hearts, he knows he’s unlikely to follow his mother to being healthy and active in his 90s. His dad made it to 70, grandpa to 61. If he doesn’t indulge himself in his 70s, he may not get the chance.
I think that unconditionally trying to prevent McCain from restoring his rep after the election would be a bad call. He’s still going to be in the Senate, we should definitely try to defeat him, perhaps with Arizona’s great governor, next time he’s up for re-election. But until then we’ve got filibusters to deal with to get the progressive agenda through.
After Keating 5, McCain genuinely pushed hard for campaign finance reform. Might not be the best form of it, but those laws encouraged and reinforced the rise of the small donor net campaigns. If, and only if, McCain is willing to throw his effort behind some issue like Cap and Trade, which he supposedly supports, it’d be more useful for us to have that vote than just to hurt his rep. Why would he? Because the Republicans are going to blame him for his loss with crazy talk like he’s too liberal and such. He may end up more pissed at them than he is at us.
Longer version of the argument here.