The gated communities of Baghdad -- that is, the sectarian enclaves divided from one another by massive, U.S.-constructed concrete blast walls -- are starting to come down, reports The New York Times. Given that, this Guardian piece of mine from last April looks pretty stupid and hysterical. I did not expect, obviously, that the surge could have succeeded in diminishing violence to January-2004 levels; and certainly did not expect after my trip last March to Baghdad and Mosul that the blast walls would be torn down in 18 months.
This is unequivocally great news. Normalcy is great news. A decline in violence is great news. Given that great news, it might make more sense to, you know, slash troop levels beyond 8000 next year.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight


Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
Why would we expect the violence to “stay down” once the walls come down? Weren’t the walls stopping the violence?
And isn’t there still violence?