A somewhat restrained Crappy Hour this morning, as Megan Carpentier and I take a tour of Nixonland.

SPENCER: …Here’s my question for you: isn’t it preferable for the GOP to have nominated McCain, the Deviationist, in a year when it was all but destined to lose, so that it has an alibi for conservatism? "If only we had nominated a real conservative, a Rock of the True Church, this calamity would have never befallen us…" etc etc?

MEGAN: I mean, I think the problem with that narrative now is twofold, which is not to say they won’t try it out. First, he was pretty well enthusiastically embraced by the conservative machinery after he swore fealty to the elimination of my reproductive rights and played the hell out of his conservative record on other issues. Two, he was beloved for choosing Sarah Palin, who is even further to his right and there’s plenty of evidence that her nomination did him no favors. I am sure that the party will do some soul-searching in November — hopefully without the violence some of us fear, but they should have done that after 2006 and didn’t. Instead, you got Boehner and Cantor and Blunt and DeMint and Coburn stepping up the partisanship, swinging to the right and generally echoing their already-failed tactics. Tom Davis said six months ago ago that if the GOP brand was dog food, they’d pull it from the shelves and I think that holds. Also, every time I hear "the party of staying out of people’s lives" I yell back at the TV "unless you have a uterus." That’s the fundamental conflict, and it’s not resolve-able. Either they go back to being small-government and fiscally conservative, or they embrace the big-government interfere-y mentality of the culture wars on things like abortion, same-sex marriage and abstinence-only education. But I think they’re seeing they can’t have it both ways.