<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gestures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:59:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: macaquerman</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/#comment-2736</link>
		<dc:creator>macaquerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/#comment-2736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Too shay?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too shay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Ackerman</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/#comment-2735</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/#comment-2735</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You were never opposed to Rumsfeld.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were never opposed to Rumsfeld.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macaquerman</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/#comment-2734</link>
		<dc:creator>macaquerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/#comment-2734</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gee, you’re not forgetting someone, are you?  Too old? Too obvious?  Too opposed to Rumsfeld?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, you’re not forgetting someone, are you?  Too old? Too obvious?  Too opposed to Rumsfeld?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WilliamOckham</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/#comment-2733</link>
		<dc:creator>WilliamOckham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/#comment-2733</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wes Clark?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wes Clark?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peterr</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/#comment-2732</link>
		<dc:creator>Peterr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/10/15/progates/#comment-2732</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;All of that militates for appointing someone to the Pentagon whom the building trusts. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, but if the only reason for keeping Gates is this political one, there have to be others that would meet that criteria. You mention two of the most obvious, and their probable reasons for declining, but certainly there are more. It is also critical that the person chosen have the trust of others. Given the DOD shenanegans not just over things in the past like Abu G. but the current show trials at Gitmo (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/13/AR2008101302419.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;who really needs decent interpreters, anyway&lt;/a&gt;?), DOD &lt;em&gt;must&lt;/em&gt; have a new head to have any credibility OUTSIDE its own five walls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How about getting Webb and Zinni and a couple of other folks who are well respected by the officer corps to suggest a couple of names to Obama? If Obama says “Give me five names, and I’ll pick one of them,” it’s a gamble on his part but also a sign of his willingness to pick someone with obvious credentials and support both inside and outside the military.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>All of that militates for appointing someone to the Pentagon whom the building trusts. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, but if the only reason for keeping Gates is this political one, there have to be others that would meet that criteria. You mention two of the most obvious, and their probable reasons for declining, but certainly there are more. It is also critical that the person chosen have the trust of others. Given the DOD shenanegans not just over things in the past like Abu G. but the current show trials at Gitmo (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/13/AR2008101302419.html" rel="nofollow">who really needs decent interpreters, anyway</a>?), DOD <em>must</em> have a new head to have any credibility OUTSIDE its own five walls.</p>
<p>How about getting Webb and Zinni and a couple of other folks who are well respected by the officer corps to suggest a couple of names to Obama? If Obama says “Give me five names, and I’ll pick one of them,” it’s a gamble on his part but also a sign of his willingness to pick someone with obvious credentials and support both inside and outside the military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.218 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 04:14:45 -->

