It’s often said that liberals don’t know how to take yes for an answer and invite people into the coalition. Well, true enough. Here’s the Washington Post endorsing Obama, and I’m hung up on this:
On most policies, such as the need to go after al-Qaeda, check Iran’s nuclear ambitions and fight HIV/AIDS abroad, he differs little from Mr. Bush or Mr. McCain.
I know! I know. I should see the forest. But this tree needs to be stuffed into a woodchipper. The only way anyone could accept the above statement is on the level of pure bromide. Yes, we all wish to confront al-Qaeda and fight HIV/AIDS and find ponies. The issue is policy. No one who has paid even cursory attention would ever say that these three men have the same policies toward these broadly-shared-to-the-point-of-uselessness goals. It’s fitting that the most obnoxious editorial page in the business, which makes such a ceaseless habit of hectoring other people — typically on the left — for their supposed lack of "seriousness" should be so blatantly and casually agnostic to policy.
By which I mean: welcome to the family, Fred Hiatt. We’ve got the grill going out in the back. Burgers or chicken?



3 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Get Retarded ?
I’ve gotta say, the left’s portrayal of Bush’s AIDS initiatives as corrupt money scams for abstinence-only programs has been one of most unfair and ignorant portrayals going around.
If Obama far exceeded all your expectations in regard to how heavily he supported AIDS programs in Africa, it probably still wouldn’t even measure up to what Bush has done. Yet because a sterotype of Christian Republicans is easier for stupid bloggers to use in a snarky dismissal of any mention of it, you literally cannot find any liberal who’s aware of this.
For all the bitching about Fox news we see on blogs, they sure have taken the formula and made it their own, to the intellectual detriment of their readers.
Got a link for any of that unfairness and ignorance, Kilo?
Bloggers don’t need a stereotype of Christian Republicans to go after the Bush administration’s pandering to the TheoCon Right at the expense of lives of people with AIDS in Africa and elsewhere. The Boston Globe took a look at the Bush policies and practices — not the rhetoric — and the picture wasn’t pretty:
That’s just a taste. Here’s another:
Do go and read the whole piece.
You’ve cited a couple of stories talking about cuts in funding and promotion of abstinence education instead of providing condoms, while talking about “the Bush administration’s pandering to the TheoCon Right at the expense of lives of people with AIDS in Africa”
They’ve dwarfed all previous amounts of funding and condoms provided to Africa. Yet this is what you know and will refer to when discussing it.
“Got a link for any of that unfairness and ignorance, Kilo?”
Do we need to leave this page to confirm that ?