So Barack Obama said that Colin Powell will have "a role as one of my advisers." What should Obama have Powell do?
A cabinet post is extremely unlikely. You don’t go from Secretary of State to anything else — it’s been a longstanding tradition, stretching back to Washington, that the Secretary of State is first among equals in the cabinet, as a friend pointed out to me over dinner this weekend. (A subcabinet post would be, accordingly, an insult.) Which is all well and good, since you don’t really want a Bush cabinet official — who isn’t Bob Gates! — returning to service in a Democratic administration.
What would be both valuable to Obama (and the country) and a good use of Powell’s talents would be to use him as a special presidential envoy to some intractible problem. Powell’s reputation may have taken a beating among liberals in the U.S. — all of it deserved — but internationally he remains both a widely-respected figure and a known quantity. It would signal a real seriousness if Obama dispatched Powell to, say, broker an Israeli-Palestinian settlement. Powell has dealt with pretty much every Sunni Arab government in the region for two decades, as well, and would make an excellent candidate to represent the U.S. at, say, a regional summit on Iraq. And I’m sure Powell would leap at the opportunity to help resolve the war he undoubtedly regrets helping start.
Login Here




3 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
he should clearly be be in charge of investigating claims of human rights violations in Iraq by US soldiers, after all, he has experience, dontcha know? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_massacre
Is it too snarky to suggest U.N. ambassador or National Security Adviser?
I know a lot of soldiers fight responsibly and respectfully, but there is an intolerable amount of civilian deaths in Iraq, Afghanistan and now Pakistan. I don’t know whether it’s top down intelligence failures or simply mechanical failures of the ’smart missiles’ and thus ‘acceptable losses.’ Either way, there needs to be a non-military, yet non-antagonistic task force assembled to bring civilian losses to the absolute minimum. This is getting absurd and destroying what little is left of American reputation. There *is* no such thing as ‘acceptable losses’ when it comes to a sovereign ally nation’s civilians. American soldiers caught hell when an Italian died in Iraq, yet there’s nothing when far worse happens to our allies in the Mid-East.
There needs to be some form of top-down, non-antagonistic military reform. Powell has the experience, and might just want to earn a bit of redemption. Also, your idea of working with Blair on the Israel-Palestine issue is also very good.