In the brief period since the release of Ayman al-Zawahiri’s "House Negro" tape, bloggers have gone crazy celebrating the U.S.’s free-of-charge good fortune. Over at TAPPED, Adam Serwer calls it an Al Qaeda "Epic Fail" — proving himself knowledgable of all internet traditions — and succinctly remarks:
There’s been a lot of skepticism about an Obama victory shifting the Muslim world’s view of the United States, but judging by this statement at the very least it’s made Al Qaeda’s efforts to develop a compelling rhetorical indictment of America visibly more difficult.
That’s exactly right. It’s easy to forget how much of the world personalizes foreign policy. (Americans, of course, are no exception.) With an American president as loathed as George W. Bush around the world, it’s easy for Al Qaeda to portray the U.S. as venal and stupid and brutish as he’s proven. Obama complicates the narrative significantly: the very color of his skin, precisely what Al Qaeda mocks, symbolizes America’s willingness to change. That’s exactly what Al Qaeda fears most.
That’s why I kind of disagree with my friend Eric Martin of Obsidian Wings when he writes, "for no apparent reason, Zawahiri leads al-Qaeda directly into that headwind with a racial insult that serves little ideological purpose." The racial epithet is a botched way of advancing a deep ideological necessity for Al Qaeda: to keep its narrative going, Zawahiri has to define Obama as not authentically American. As guest-poster RockRichard puts it, "It flies in the face of their portrayal of an evil zionist empire."
None of this is to say that the election of Barack Obama magically transforms the war on terrorism. Policy is still policy. Right now I’m finishing up a piece about what a new progressive counterterrorism agenda for the Obama administration might look like. The Muslim world, rather understandably, will judge Obama by what he does, not by how he looks. And the honeymoon with Obama, both domestically and globally, will inevitably end.
Still, as Ilan Goldenberg notes at Democracy Arsenal, "Al Qaeda’s narrative is now under siege and it’s clearly uncertain about how to react." That sort of disruption is precisely what the U.S. needs to rapidly exploit. In both policy and public-diplomacy terms, the clay is still wet. Why haven’t we seen the State Dept.’s blog hit the Zawahiri "House Negro" tape yet?
Crossposted to The Streak.
Login Here




5 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
“… not authentically…” Did you mean to say African-American?
No, I meant not authentically American. But I see your point too.
Zawahiri must not have watched the evisceration of Nader that followed his “Uncle Tom” comment. It seems pretty obvious that you don’t win rhetorical points for attacking a figure due to his race, but then, both of these guys seem to have their own mental challenges.
Ya think ?
Meanwhile, the concept of a leader selling out and being a puppet isn’t something new for the jihadi community. Most of the time arab muslims are successfully portrayed as not significantly arably muslimy enough, so I wouldn’t immediately suggest this isn’t going to play well for the intended audience. A demographic that views this whole POTUS role as the worst possible flaw, not the greatest prize as all of you do.
Unless you preiously agreed with putting a whole bunch of other leaders to death for similar reasons, you don’t get to call this a fail on behalf of anyone.
Eric Martin quote his Somali islamist contacts when he made his assessment on behalf of that demographic, did he ?
Not a lot. He’s still the POTUS.
You think there’s any colour you could put in charge of Israel that would serve as a bullet proof vest ? No ? Well what’s different here ?
Sadat wasn’t exactly an albino. Everywhere you look in history for jihadists the issue of race and ethnicity hasn’t compared as an issue to the policies that mark leaders as targets.
Either someone’s suggesting the US under Obama is going to change the bipartisan-supported policies that made Clinton a personal assassination target and your country a target for a string of terrorist attacks, or nobody is. Nobody is.