<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counterattack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/</link>
	<description>Just another Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:28:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: macaquerman</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator>macaquerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/#comment-3835</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Spencer, just for giggles, can you gimme a brief idea of what you mean by “progressive”?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spencer, just for giggles, can you gimme a brief idea of what you mean by “progressive”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlchemyToday</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-3832</link>
		<dc:creator>AlchemyToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/#comment-3832</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Also, who exactly is proposing that we focus on Pakistan alone?  The level of expertise and interest demonstrated by that quote is roughly that of someone who listened to a couple of Obama’s foreign policy speeches and regurgitated them and screwed up a couple details in the process.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, who exactly is proposing that we focus on Pakistan alone?  The level of expertise and interest demonstrated by that quote is roughly that of someone who listened to a couple of Obama’s foreign policy speeches and regurgitated them and screwed up a couple details in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlchemyToday</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-3831</link>
		<dc:creator>AlchemyToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/#comment-3831</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Seriously… Taylor Marsh?  That has to be the single easiest person in the world to get to respond to a request for a quote.  The Independent’s fact checkers should’ve given you a slap on the wrist for calling her a radio host as well - &lt;a href=&quot;http://johnbrownks.blogspot.com/2008/03/fraud-or-legitimate-pundit-taylor-marsh.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://johnbrownks.blogspot.co.....marsh.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think a fair minimum for judging the behavior of wannabe progressive talking heads from this point forward is that, if they ever pushed the idea of a tape where Michelle Obama said “whitey” a lot, this fact must be included side-by-side with whatever commentary they offer so that a reader is fully informed on the quality of their expertise - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php?id=27847&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.taylormarsh.com/arc.....p?id=27847&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously… Taylor Marsh?  That has to be the single easiest person in the world to get to respond to a request for a quote.  The Independent’s fact checkers should’ve given you a slap on the wrist for calling her a radio host as well &#8211; <a href="http://johnbrownks.blogspot.com/2008/03/fraud-or-legitimate-pundit-taylor-marsh.html" rel="nofollow">http://johnbrownks.blogspot.co&#8230;..marsh.html</a></p>
<p>I think a fair minimum for judging the behavior of wannabe progressive talking heads from this point forward is that, if they ever pushed the idea of a tape where Michelle Obama said “whitey” a lot, this fact must be included side-by-side with whatever commentary they offer so that a reader is fully informed on the quality of their expertise &#8211; <a href="http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php?id=27847" rel="nofollow">http://www.taylormarsh.com/arc&#8230;..p?id=27847</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kilo</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/#comment-3826</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BTW here’s a story about a detainee on trial in that no-Gitmo world, which is supposedly somehow better…&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/dark-side-of-us-counterterrorism-on-trial/2008/11/20/1226770630158.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.smh.com.au/news/wor.....30158.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you’ve got Gitmo + a dozen black sites where your existence and detention is denied and you close Gitmo, you’re left with what ?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW here’s a story about a detainee on trial in that no-Gitmo world, which is supposedly somehow better…<br /><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/dark-side-of-us-counterterrorism-on-trial/2008/11/20/1226770630158.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/news/wor&#8230;..30158.html</a></p>
<p>If you’ve got Gitmo + a dozen black sites where your existence and detention is denied and you close Gitmo, you’re left with what ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kilo</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-3825</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/11/20/progressivecounterterrorism/#comment-3825</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Personally I thought that said precisely nothing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, how about you give the Pakis some drones already. They’ve clipped like 3000 militants themselves during the period in which every single US airstrike causes a diplomatic incident. There’s a simple solution there, especially given that you’re already commmitted to supplying air force equipment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take the NSA spying on Americans. Big problem if you do it from the US and call yourself the NSA. Give your equipment to Canada and call yourself something else and you achieve the exact same result with a little plausible deniability that goes a long way.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I thought that said precisely nothing.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, how about you give the Pakis some drones already. They’ve clipped like 3000 militants themselves during the period in which every single US airstrike causes a diplomatic incident. There’s a simple solution there, especially given that you’re already commmitted to supplying air force equipment.</p>
<p>Take the NSA spying on Americans. Big problem if you do it from the US and call yourself the NSA. Give your equipment to Canada and call yourself something else and you achieve the exact same result with a little plausible deniability that goes a long way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
