The Washington Post‘s Chris Cilizza has an absurd item about Bill Richardson emerging as a leading contender for commerce secretary. Apparently Penny Pritzker is out for some sort of thorny — crooked? — business dealings and, let’s not beat around the bush, Obama hasn’t appointed any Latinos to anything. Yet Richardson is a former U.N. ambassador and energy secretary and is currently the governor of a major southwestern state. The only non-demotive cabinet posts he can accept are at State and the Pentagon. Neither appears to be in the cards.
So you’ve got a thorny diversity question here, and we’ve already seen diversity questions get bitter and nasty. But I think there’s a way out of this. Commerce Secretary Matthew Yglesias.
Yglesias, like Barack Obama, is a mutt. Half-Richardson and half-Pritzker, he’s both Cuban and Jewish, and just ethnic-y enough to come off as authentic to both communities, while possessing a milky-white complexion that says to Middle America, "I’m not going to steal your wallet or overspice your food or guide you toward unsound investment opportunities." As the Flophouse resident in charge of rent collection, his policies were stern but fair, although his administration took a deeply regressive position on charging the least-employed tenant the highest amount of rent. It could become an issue at his confirmation hearings, although he can credibly object that he was merely implementing an agreed-upon decision.
But it’s not just his Latino-ness or his Jewishness that commends Yglesias to the position. Progressive bloggers are feeling disillusioned at the moment — not only over the prospect of a Hillary appointment to secretary of state, but to the fact that the only blogger to receive a high-level position so far is Peter Orszag, who, while being both a progressive and a blogger, is not exactly a progressive blogger. Yglesias is eagerly embraced by both the Atlantic and the Netroots Nation crowds. I’ve seen it with my own eyes.
Finally, you get someone who’s not afraid to take on the excesses in his own communities. Yglesias is a craven appeaser of both the Castro regime and the Palestinians. And he’s not intimidated by powerful netroots forces like Chris Bowers. Youthful indiscretions aside, Secretary Yglesias is change we can believe in.



7 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Blogger identity politics — this has promise.
if the lefty blogosphere didn’t get message by being mugged on the FISA flip-flop .. and now HRC to SecState .. when will they get the message??
the message btw is F.U. and ESAD ..
I won’t believe this until Rahm leaks it officially.
But Spencer, it seems to me that there is a problem with your suggestion. If I recall correctly, Matthew is either 12 or 13, and I suspect Congress will have a hard time approving a choice for Secretary of Commerce who is not only not old enough to succeed to the Presidency, but not even old to vote. HOWEVER, he would make an excellent press secretary, since his status as a blogger would be deeply frightening to older reporters AND his inability to see over the podium means that no reporter would be able to discern his facial expressions, thus ensuring that reporters would be forced to turn at all time to Rahm Emmanuel for anonymous leaks. Their gratitude at being able to publish some small scrap of information without having to confront the scary 12-year-old blogger would help guarantee favorable news coverage for the Obama administration for some years to come.
Best of all, Matthew would then have plenty of time to blog on the government’s dime.
max
[’In your heart, you know I’m right.’]
But is there a spelling test?
I think it’s inspired. I have found reading Yglesias over the years to be an edifying experience.
I would not know what the word “Jewban” meant were it not for him.
Yglesias? You mean the guy who just wrote this about Putin & Co. rewriting the Russian constitution:
“I like how the elected parliament [i.e. the Russian Duma] voting to enact a popular measure constitutes a ‘giant crack’ in the foundation of Russian democracy.”
Or maybe it’s his grasp of labor issues — or practically anything thing having to do with working people?
Standards must not be that high. On the other hand, maybe you just can’t do that much damage as the Sec. of Commerce.