The good thing about staying on as defense secretary is that you can fly into Kandahar whenever you feel like it. And, like a baller, you can announce new troop deployments. Yochi Dreazen hangs out with Bob Gates and reports:
The Pentagon hopes to deploy two additional combat brigades to Afghanistan by next summer, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Wednesday, accelerating the shift of resources from Iraq.
Which units, precisely, haven’t been decided yet, but Dreazen reports that one of them may be "diverted from Iraq." With the new brigade combat team that’s going to be positioned (mostly) in the Logar-Wardak area, the additional troop component now stands at three brigades by (maybe) the summer, one shy of the four that Gen. David McKiernan, commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, has requested.
So the U.S. will get three new brigades for Afghanistan. The Marine Corps wants to go all-in. But what the U.S. still doesn’t have is a clear achievable strategy, as Jack Murtha pointed out yesterday. There’s a review being conducted by Gen. David Petraeus. Inevitably there’ll be a review conducted by the Obama administration once it takes office. But unless those reviews address the hard questions — what are the right goals for the U.S. in Afghanistan? What’s it going to take to achieve them? What’s a reasonable and what’s an unreasonable cost for success? — all that Afghanistan is going to bring the U.S. is more suffering. Jim Jones, the incoming national security adviser, has given indications that he agrees. But we’ll have to wait and see.
Crossposted to The Streak.



5 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
It’s now passing our low point in Afghanistan and it’s likely that short-term military gains will be impressive. The expected spring offensive from the radicals will fizzle and from then on they be playing defense.
Well, solution is simple – our NATO allies could put in troops, just how many do they have there?
How about the great UN, maybe they could transfer in some of the troops that they have in the congo? I think the women in the Congo may like that idea.
You needn’t worry about a sufficiency of non-US troops being available. Unless Pakistan commits a large number of men to fight the Pakistani-based radicals and to help seal the Afghan-Pak border, we would have little trouble in persuading the Indian military to send all the help we might need to secure Afghanistan.
Had not thought of that – beautifully simple way of taking care of the problem. NATO can rest its tired forces and the UN need not bother its wearied troops, India, with no axe to grind, can step forward and fill the void that NATO or the UN should step up to.
Oh, you can be sure the Indians will be bringing a rather large set of axes, but that’s the point.