Maybe Eli Lake was right about this.
According to McClatchy, Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh has been up to some trifling stuff, saying in an interview in Washington that U.S. troops might be needed for another ten years, despite the Status of Forces Agreement’s provisions to end the occupation by Dec. 2011:
"We do understand that the Iraqi military is not going to get built out in the three years. We do need many more years. It might be 10 years," he said.
The Iraqi political figures interviewed by McClatchy are incensed at Dabbagh’s statements. But they have a Plan B:
"We expected something odd," said Alaa Maki, a member of a Sunni Muslim political bloc that’s forced Maliki to put the security agreement before voters as a referendum next year. "That is the reason we pushed for the referendum."
That would be this referendum, the one that might kick the U.S. out by 2010 and about which Dabbagh wouldn’t say much when I asked him on Tuesday.
Login Here




5 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
This the same guy that you cited as calling for a Iran-Iraq-Kuwait-Syria economic union. Homey?
geeze ..we’ve already been “training the iraqi army” for six or seven years now ..and it’s going to take another ten years to get ‘em ginned up to par ??
shit .. hire the insurgents then ..pay ‘em enough to make it worth their while .. whatever .. but get us the fuck outta iraq ..please ..
we been training the Pakistani army for thirty or more and they still can’t run a competent dictatorship.
yeah .. the key word being “competent” eh ..
Rome was not built in a day.
Words on a piece of paper do not make it happen.
These sound exactly like what Macain said, reality, some just do not wish reality
make it written, make it so – only works for pharos in old egyptian movies