This is a really creepy press release — yes, yes, somehow creepier than this now-resolved controversy with Yglesias — that the U.S. military command in Afghanistan just emailed reporters under the headline "Suspected Militants Die In Zabul Province." I reprint it here in its entirety:
Two known Taliban extremists were reported deceased on Dec. 18. The militants were part of a group of five suspects taken into custody, Dec. 17, by Afghan National Police and Coalition forces during a combined patrol conducted in Shinkay district, located in Zabul Province, approximately 160 km northeast of Kandahar. The five detainees were last seen alive at the Surri Police Station the early morning of the 18th, according to a Coalition report.
“We are committed to get to the truth as quickly as possible,” said Col. Greg Julian, “We will strive together to provide rule of law and better security for the Afghan people.”
A joint investigation is being conducted by Coalition forces and Afghan National Police.
This is a confusing and euphemistic press release, to say the least. (Are the two dead men "known Taliban extremists" or "suspected militants"?) The release suggests that the detainees died in Afghan National Police custody, but it’s by no means clear. What could have changed between the "early morning" of Dec. 18 and later that day, when the detainees "were reported deceased"? (Who reported them deceased?) What was the cause of death? Was an autopsy performed? If the detainees didn’t die in U.S. custody, what are the U.S. oversight procedures for detainees apprehended in joint custody and taken to Afghan prisons? Have either the Afghan police unit in question or the U.S. unit in question had any prior noted history of detainee abuse?
I have an email out to the U.S. command in Afghanistan and will update with any further information I have.
Crossposted to The Streak.
Update: So this is what I have so far from the military:
Spencer,
We have read your query and provide the following response:
The five detainees were last seen alive at the Surri Police Station the
early morning of the 18th, according to a Coalition report."We are committed to get to the truth as quickly as possible,"
said Col. Greg Julian, "We will strive together to provide rule of law
and better security for the Afghan people."A joint investigation is being conducted by Coalition forces and
Afghan National Police.
As you can see above, that "response" is contained in the original press release. I pointed that out in a follow-up email, reiterated my questions, and added a few others. I will keep you posted if and when I hear anything.
Login Here




32 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
Thanks for this info Spencer and please do keep us updated. I mean, it’s not like the US and puppets haven’t tried to slip things through before.
And the bodies were completly unmarked, and the death was from unknown causes. Right?
What about the other 3 – and who has them now?
No idea about anything further that’s substantive. In a little while I’ll be posting an update to this.
“you reap what you sow.”
When will this stop?
Maybe they can get Ollie North to verify what happened
Those are just the ones that they admit to. With a press release like this, I suspect something much bigger is going on.
They are breaking new ground in the use of the passive tense.
These were extremely dangerous men. They were reportedly wearing shoes.
-G
The infamous passive voice is used whenever bad stuff is going on. It’s a tell.
Is this the offical line of the Politburo? Did a Troika decide their fate? It’s all sounds sickeningly like murder.
Hey guys, I’ve just updated with a response I got from the U.S. military command in Afghanistan.
Very enlightening. /s
Heh, maybe if they keep repeating it you’ll go away, Spencer!
Suspects last seen alive. . . We have a commitment to (?) . . . Investigation carried out by . . . (?)
The murderers themselves? I guess suspects are guilty before innocent there?
Frontier justice.
More like NKVD troika justice.
Any guesses as to what might be going on? I am thinking that somehow the fate of the “disappeared” might have gone too public.
@18 I am taking a random shot in the dark of course.
The passive is a voice, not a tense. Verbs are usually divided into moods: indicative, subjunctive, and imperative. The indicative and subjunctive can be subdivided into voices: active and passive. Some languages, like Ancient Greek, also had a middle voice. Then there is tense which refers to time. We usually think of there being 3 tenses: present, past, and future. Linguists only recognize two: present and past. Future and other kinds nuance, like the imperfect to convey indefinite or repeated action, are described as aspect.
Verbs can also be transitive (taking an object) or intransitive (not). This brings up another major distinction in languages. English is called a nominative-accusative language because both transitive and intransitive verbs take subjects. But there is another common language type in the world called ergative-absolutive. The transitive forms are the same as in English but the “subjects” of the intransitive forms act like direct objects of their verb.
Hope this helps.
And your other thoughts on all this, Sir?
It sounds creepy. Something happened and they are investigating what that was. Of course, if they thought that something bad had not happened, no questions would have been raised and no even pro forma investigation would have been mounted.
it’s been almost 7 years since i first read reports of the mass graves and widespread prisoner abuse in sheberghan:
from today’s update:
So I am thinking they’ll try to put it in the x-files?
New guy shows up at Harvard and goes up to the first person he sees: “Hey, where’s the library at?”
The Harvard guy looks him up and down and says “At Harvard, we do not end our sentences in a preposition!”
The new guy says, “OK, where’s the library at, asshole?”
Oh c’mon. It’s just Hugh. We all have to humour each other.
I was just making a funny.
PS Real Americans spell it “humor.”
But, but, I am American, and that’s how I was taught in grammar school. They tried to fix me in college, but I slip up sometimes. I use spellcheck to fix it when I’m writing formally, but others in my area make those same “mistakes,” so I am not the only one.
or maybe “quickly” doesn’t mean what i think it does?
I think “bury it” is more what they have in mind.
Harvard has a lot of libraries. 80 at least, I believe. Proper reply: “WHICH library?”
Whether or not they were wearing shoes is besides the point.
If they had feet, that proves they had the potential for maybe someday wearing shoes. And thus were valid targets…
(there seems to be no end to u.s. crimes against humanity).