Last week, Rabbi Eric Yoffie called J Street "morally deficient, profoundly out of touch with Jewish sentiment and also appallingly naïve" for criticizing the bombardment of Gaza. See Yglesias for J Street’s response and for an eloquent exposition of how noxious it is for Yoffie to police the boundaries of Jewish discourse.
The only thing I’d add is a thought experiment. If a prominent Muslim cleric made a point of telling his co-religionists that they would be out of line with the mainstream of their faith community if they criticized an act of political violence too stridently, would American Jews
a) celebrate such a statement as a forthright statement of moral clarity; or
b) smugly congratulate themselves on their relative abundance of intellectual freedom?
Login Here




4 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
I guess Yoffie does little to alleviate the discouragement I expressed on an earlier thread about “the lack of ‘really excellent and mature sentiment’ from any Rabbis.”
C: Congratulate themselves for their moral superiority to the uncivilized Muslims
D) wish that the act of violence had been perpetrated upon Michael Goldfarb.
and I offer an apology for my misguided remarks to the effect that the flabby bastard was owed any decency.
Kick ‘im in the teets