<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Of All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/</link>
	<description>Just another Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:24:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kilo</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/comment-page-1/#comment-5880</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/#comment-5880</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh and from the same interview it seems we finally have Obama himself ruling out any prosecutions of Bush Admin officials for wiretapping, torture, etc….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;STEPHANOPOULOS: The most popular question on your own website is related to this. On change.gov it comes from Bob Fertik of New York City and he asks, “Will you appoint a special prosecutor ideally Patrick Fitzgerald to independently investigate the greatest crimes of the Bush administration, including torture and warrantless wiretapping.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBAMA: We’re still evaluating how we’re going to approach the whole issue of interrogations, detentions, and so forth. And obviously we’re going to be looking at past practices and I don’t believe that anybody is above the law. On the other hand I also have a belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards. And part of my job is to make sure that for example at the CIA, you’ve got extraordinarily talented people who are working very hard to keep Americans safe. I don’t want them to suddenly feel like they’ve got to spend all their time looking over their shoulders and lawyering (ph).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STEPHANOPOULOS: So, no 9/11 commission with Independence subpoena power?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBAMA: We have not made final decisions, but my instinct is for us to focus on how do we make sure that moving forward we are doing the right thing. That doesn’t mean that if somebody has blatantly broken the law, that they are above the law. But my orientation’s going to be to move forward.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STEPHANOPOULOS: So, let me just press that one more time. You’re not ruling out prosecution, but will you tell your Justice Department to investigate these cases and follow the evidence wherever it leads?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBAMA: What I — I think my general view when it comes to my attorney general is he is the people’s lawyer. Eric Holder’s been nominated. His job is to uphold the Constitution and look after the interests of the American people, not to be swayed by my day-to-day politics. So, ultimately, he’s going to be making some calls, but my general belief is that when it comes to national security, what we have to focus on is getting things right in the future, as opposed looking at what we got wrong in the past.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One would think that’d rate a mention on all the blogs that’ve spent more than zero words calling for this over the past 8 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and from the same interview it seems we finally have Obama himself ruling out any prosecutions of Bush Admin officials for wiretapping, torture, etc….</p>
<blockquote><p>STEPHANOPOULOS: The most popular question on your own website is related to this. On change.gov it comes from Bob Fertik of New York City and he asks, “Will you appoint a special prosecutor ideally Patrick Fitzgerald to independently investigate the greatest crimes of the Bush administration, including torture and warrantless wiretapping.”</p>
<p>OBAMA: We’re still evaluating how we’re going to approach the whole issue of interrogations, detentions, and so forth. And obviously we’re going to be looking at past practices and I don’t believe that anybody is above the law. On the other hand I also have a belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards. And part of my job is to make sure that for example at the CIA, you’ve got extraordinarily talented people who are working very hard to keep Americans safe. I don’t want them to suddenly feel like they’ve got to spend all their time looking over their shoulders and lawyering (ph).</p>
<p>STEPHANOPOULOS: So, no 9/11 commission with Independence subpoena power?</p>
<p>OBAMA: We have not made final decisions, but my instinct is for us to focus on how do we make sure that moving forward we are doing the right thing. That doesn’t mean that if somebody has blatantly broken the law, that they are above the law. But my orientation’s going to be to move forward.</p>
<p>STEPHANOPOULOS: So, let me just press that one more time. You’re not ruling out prosecution, but will you tell your Justice Department to investigate these cases and follow the evidence wherever it leads?</p>
<p>OBAMA: What I — I think my general view when it comes to my attorney general is he is the people’s lawyer. Eric Holder’s been nominated. His job is to uphold the Constitution and look after the interests of the American people, not to be swayed by my day-to-day politics. So, ultimately, he’s going to be making some calls, but my general belief is that when it comes to national security, what we have to focus on is getting things right in the future, as opposed looking at what we got wrong in the past.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>One would think that’d rate a mention on all the blogs that’ve spent more than zero words calling for this over the past 8 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kilo</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/comment-page-1/#comment-5879</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/#comment-5879</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This isn’t real reassuring….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;DICK CHENEY: [Audio clip of his advice to Obama] Before you start to implement your campaign rhetoric you need to sit down and find out precisely what it is we did and how we did it. Because it is going to be vital to keeping the nation safe and secure in the years ahead and it would be a tragedy if they threw over those policies simply because they’ve campaigned against them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(END OF AUDIO CLIP)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STEPHANOPOULOS: Are you going to take it [Cheney’s Advce] ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBAMA: I think that was pretty good advice, which is I should know what’s going on before we make judgments and that we shouldn’t be making judgments on the basis of incomplete information or campaign rhetoric. So, I’ve got no quibble with that particular quote. I think if Vice President Cheney were here he and I would have some significant disagreements on some things that we know happened.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STEPHANOPOULOS: You would say for example?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBAMA: For example, Vice President Cheney I think continues to defend what he calls extraordinary measures or procedures when it comes to interrogations and from my view waterboarding is torture. I have said that under my administration we will not torture.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STEPHANOPOULOS: How about them taking that to the next step. Right now the CIA has a special program, would you require that that program — basically every government interrogation program be under the same standard, be in accordance with the army field manual?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBAMA: My general view is that our United States military is under fire and has huge stakes in getting good intelligence. And if our top army commanders feel comfortable with interrogation techniques that are squarely within the boundaries of rule of law, our constitution and international standards, then those are things that we should be able to (INAUDIBLE)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STEPHANOPOULOS: So no more special CIA program?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBAMA: I’m not going to lay out a particular program because again, I thought that Dick Cheney’s advice was good, which is let’s make sure we know everything that’s being done.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So on the question of whether Obama will restrict all US agencies to the interrogation standards of the Army field manual, the answer is:&lt;br /&gt;
1. That he and Cheney disagree on whether waterboarding is torture, and&lt;br /&gt;
2. It’s up to what those in the field are happy with, and&lt;br /&gt;
3. He doesn’t want to go ruling out what he said he would.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fuck me, that was quick.&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone wanna double check whether he’s still not gonna drill in ANWAR as well ?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn’t real reassuring….</p>
<blockquote><p>DICK CHENEY: [Audio clip of his advice to Obama] Before you start to implement your campaign rhetoric you need to sit down and find out precisely what it is we did and how we did it. Because it is going to be vital to keeping the nation safe and secure in the years ahead and it would be a tragedy if they threw over those policies simply because they’ve campaigned against them.</p>
<p>(END OF AUDIO CLIP)</p>
<p>STEPHANOPOULOS: Are you going to take it [Cheney’s Advce] ?</p>
<p>OBAMA: I think that was pretty good advice, which is I should know what’s going on before we make judgments and that we shouldn’t be making judgments on the basis of incomplete information or campaign rhetoric. So, I’ve got no quibble with that particular quote. I think if Vice President Cheney were here he and I would have some significant disagreements on some things that we know happened.</p>
<p>STEPHANOPOULOS: You would say for example?</p>
<p>OBAMA: For example, Vice President Cheney I think continues to defend what he calls extraordinary measures or procedures when it comes to interrogations and from my view waterboarding is torture. I have said that under my administration we will not torture.</p>
<p>STEPHANOPOULOS: How about them taking that to the next step. Right now the CIA has a special program, would you require that that program — basically every government interrogation program be under the same standard, be in accordance with the army field manual?</p>
<p>OBAMA: My general view is that our United States military is under fire and has huge stakes in getting good intelligence. And if our top army commanders feel comfortable with interrogation techniques that are squarely within the boundaries of rule of law, our constitution and international standards, then those are things that we should be able to (INAUDIBLE)</p>
<p>STEPHANOPOULOS: So no more special CIA program?</p>
<p>OBAMA: I’m not going to lay out a particular program because again, I thought that Dick Cheney’s advice was good, which is let’s make sure we know everything that’s being done.</p>
<p>So on the question of whether Obama will restrict all US agencies to the interrogation standards of the Army field manual, the answer is:<br />
1. That he and Cheney disagree on whether waterboarding is torture, and<br />
2. It’s up to what those in the field are happy with, and<br />
3. He doesn’t want to go ruling out what he said he would.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Fuck me, that was quick.<br />
Anyone wanna double check whether he’s still not gonna drill in ANWAR as well ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kilo</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/comment-page-1/#comment-5877</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/#comment-5877</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What’s #2 to compliment this then and continue that ”bush repudiation” theme ?&lt;br /&gt;
If you could tell him what executive action to take and he’d do so, on day 1, what would it be ? Serious question.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s #2 to compliment this then and continue that ”bush repudiation” theme ?<br />
If you could tell him what executive action to take and he’d do so, on day 1, what would it be ? Serious question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macaquerman</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/comment-page-1/#comment-5833</link>
		<dc:creator>macaquerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/#comment-5833</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;People might have noticed that you’ve been hinting that you’re leaning towards thinking it might be a good idea to close it down.&lt;br /&gt;
You could mention that Obama really can’t order anything done quite yet and that figuring  out his shit should come after he’s had a chance to eat.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People might have noticed that you’ve been hinting that you’re leaning towards thinking it might be a good idea to close it down.<br />
You could mention that Obama really can’t order anything done quite yet and that figuring  out his shit should come after he’s had a chance to eat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Ackerman</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/comment-page-1/#comment-5832</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/#comment-5832</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The thing is that if I do that, people will will ask me why I’m ignoring that AP piece about shutting GTMO down…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is that if I do that, people will will ask me why I’m ignoring that AP piece about shutting GTMO down…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macaquerman</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/comment-page-1/#comment-5831</link>
		<dc:creator>macaquerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/01/12/closinggtmoondayone/#comment-5831</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It might be less confusing to wait a week or two.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be less confusing to wait a week or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
