You know what Tom Donnelly, an American Enterprise Institute defense analyst, didn’t like about Obama’s Iraq speech? Well, the substance of withdrawal, sure. But he really didn’t like all the stuff Obama said about caring for Iraq veterans:
No doubt there is a genuine tenderness in the president’s feelings for soldiers. But there is little of the praise of warriors in his words. Gratitude or sympathy for suffering is quite different from honoring a sacrifice. I am sure Obama will honor his pledge to continue to ensure that people in uniform "form the backbone of our middle class." But the pay, the benefits, the programs alone are never enough and never, ultimately, what make the call to service worth answering.
"Little of the praise of warriors?" I suppose all that stuff about "Thanks in great measure to your service, the situation in Iraq has improved" or how "in an age when so many people and institutions have acted irresponsibly, you did the opposite – you volunteered to bear the heaviest burden" doesn’t count.
Donnelly says that Obama’s promises on troops’ and veterans’ health care and economic well-being is "a very subtle form of the soldier-as-victim trope that is fast becoming an Iraq legacy." That seems like an overwrought description of the national mood. There have been a handful of Hollywood flops that might have condescendingly treated soldiers as PTSD’d automatons, but beyond that, the treatment of Iraq veterans by the country has been, I think it’s fair to say, respectful verging on laudatory. Donnelly seems to be caught in something of a Vietnam Syndrome here.
More importantly, and to be a bit personal for a moment, I’ve heard some real horror stories from friends who’ve come home from Iraq and Afghanistan about how hard it is to get appointments with consistent and competent Veterans’ Affairs case workers, and VA health care is supposed to be the best in the nation. Is it treating my friends as "victims" to say that the country owes them a lot more than a pep talk about what a great job they did? Or to say that traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder are serious afflictions that require sustained and well-funded programs to treat? Just because people join the military to serve a cause greater than self isn’t an excuse not to provide veterans with the money they need to prosper when their wars end.
Crossposted to The Streak.



7 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Spence, I hope that you’re as happy about Obama and his decision as I think you must be.
Try not to let people’s flapping mouths detract from you mood. Their mostly just stunned and stuttering. Half the people commenting on your earlier post, people who you would expect to be overjoyed, can’t be happy and believe.
You stay happy a day or two.
In that spirit I wrote this.
I’m still laughing after seeing that..
Buy ‘em by the case!
Consume with heapin glasses of donkey punch.
Are we allowed to call Tom Donnelly a POS on this blog?
Nothing Obama does will ever count for anything to those people. It isn’t a matter of evaluating what Obama says and thinking ‘is this good, or not?’; it’s a matter of assuming that nothing Obama says or does is any good and figuring out how what he says or does is no good.
I love that this clown thinks he has detected the ‘very subtle’ position in this action. My guess is that he couldn’t find anything that was very subtle unless it bit him in the ass…
Some people will do anything to be shitheads. And most other people don’t practice being anti-shitheads every day, all day. So the shitheads, who do what they do se well because it is what they do all the time, always “win.”
I am not sure what they win, but it seems to make them — no, it doesn’t. They just like to be shitheads. It has no goal other than itself.
What a hopeful situation. Those soldiers — “victims.” I should say so. Went over there on a fool’s errand and lost their minds for their trouble.