Comments on: Two Choices http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/ Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:59:36 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: SMartin http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8696 SMartin Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:44:22 +0000 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8696 <p>Iowahawk had some fun with it:</p> <p><a href="http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/04/one-afternoon-in-a-secret-corner-of-the-internet.html" rel="nofollow">http://iowahawk.typepad.com/io.....ernet.html</a></p> Iowahawk had some fun with it:

http://iowahawk.typepad.com/io…..ernet.html

]]> By: Kilo http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8250 Kilo Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:01:47 +0000 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8250 <blockquote><p> crack March 19th, 2009 at 9:38 am<br /> In response to Kilo @ 11 (show text)<br /> Background Research.</p></blockquote> <p>Lie and tell me you think “background research” is a more apt description than “talking points” for this…<br /><a href="http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2009/03/who-doesnt-love-the-journolist.html" rel="nofollow">http://justoneminute.typepad.c.....olist.html</a></p>

crack March 19th, 2009 at 9:38 am
In response to Kilo @ 11 (show text)
Background Research.

Lie and tell me you think “background research” is a more apt description than “talking points” for this…
http://justoneminute.typepad.c…..olist.html

]]> By: thibaud http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8248 thibaud Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:05:52 +0000 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8248 <p>Now, now, spence, enough with the skull-f*cking already. </p> <p>At least Kaus left TNR for a legitimate publication with real writers. You’ve fallen pretty far since leaving Martyland.</p> Now, now, spence, enough with the skull-f*cking already.

At least Kaus left TNR for a legitimate publication with real writers. You’ve fallen pretty far since leaving Martyland.

]]> By: Teddy Partridge http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8238 Teddy Partridge Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:24:00 +0000 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8238 <p>Still blows goats</p> Still blows goats

]]> By: sdrDusty http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8236 sdrDusty Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:18:26 +0000 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8236 <p>I think it’s all evidence of the right wing’s continuing propensity to have “man-crushes.”</p> I think it’s all evidence of the right wing’s continuing propensity to have “man-crushes.”

]]> By: crack http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8203 crack Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:38:42 +0000 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8203 <p>Background Research.</p> Background Research.

]]> By: Kilo http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8201 Kilo Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:12:50 +0000 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8201 <blockquote><p>I think the point of the post is that he’s defending what he sees as a reasonable expectation of privacy.</p></blockquote> <p>What? Kaus spends quite a bit of time criticising it on the basis that it’s bad for business (ie “echo chamber”) and nil on that.</p> <p>It sounds fkn retarded to me. These people are bloggers. They’re already in the business of writing about what everyone else is writing about, but they want to organise that in private as well ?</p> <p>Describe this in 2 words that aren’t “talking points”.</p>

I think the point of the post is that he’s defending what he sees as a reasonable expectation of privacy.

What? Kaus spends quite a bit of time criticising it on the basis that it’s bad for business (ie “echo chamber”) and nil on that.

It sounds fkn retarded to me. These people are bloggers. They’re already in the business of writing about what everyone else is writing about, but they want to organise that in private as well ?

Describe this in 2 words that aren’t “talking points”.

]]> By: eb53 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8168 eb53 Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:24:34 +0000 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8168 <p>Re “has-been” - when was he ever? Kaus is the same as he always was, which was never very much.</p> Re “has-been” – when was he ever? Kaus is the same as he always was, which was never very much.

]]> By: aqamal http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8167 aqamal Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:00:01 +0000 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8167 <p>Fair. And a good one to you.</p> Fair. And a good one to you.

]]> By: macaquerman http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8165 macaquerman Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:50:33 +0000 http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/03/18/two-choices/#comment-8165 <p>If Kaus doesn’t engage in any similar practices, then you and I agree as to his right to decry them.<br /> I got a chuckle out of your line about marshaling a common response and if they actually do, I’ll tip my cap to you.<br /> Have a good one.</p> If Kaus doesn’t engage in any similar practices, then you and I agree as to his right to decry them.
I got a chuckle out of your line about marshaling a common response and if they actually do, I’ll tip my cap to you.
Have a good one.

]]>