Forty years as an occupier can result in thinking like this:
"When we show Sderot, others also see Gaza," said Ido Aharoni, manager of a rebranding team at the Foreign Ministry. "Everything is twinned when seen through the conflict. The country needs to position itself as an attractive personality, to make outsiders see it in all its reality. Instead, we are focusing on crisis management. And that is never going to get us where we need to go over the long term."
Mr. Gilboa, the political scientist, said branding was not enough. "We need to do much more to educate the world about our situation," he said. Regarding the extra $2 million budgeted for this, he said: "We need 50 million. We need 100 million."
Let’s dispense with the idea that anyone thinks peacemaking is in any sense easy. It’s arduous and painful and filled with missteps, acrimony and paranoia. It involves earned trust and blind faith. But the first step to repairing a condition of international isolation is to address its root causes. $100 million in international education is not going to persuade anyone that the Palestinians do not have a right to independent statehood. Alternatively, it takes maybe 75 cents’ worth of conversation to persuade any fair-minded person that Israel faces unreasonable and intolerable threats to its security. These are settled arguments.
There’s a story that David Petraeus tells about his arrival in Baghdad. A few weeks into his command in Iraq, he started receiving guests from the U.S. concerned about opposition to the surge. "Dave, you’ve got a real public-diplomacy problem," they’d say. "Respectfully," he’d respond, "I don’t have a public-diplomacy problem. I have a results problem." Israel should learn from that example. If Benjamin Netanyahu’s government opposes a robust peace process that leads, concretely, to the formation of a Palestinian state — particularly with a racist as his foreign minister — there’s no amount of Karen Hughes-ery that can get around history’s verdict. Will the creation of an independent Palestine end the Muslim world’s problems with Israel? No, of course not — but anyone who uses that as an excuse for inaction is a fool; and, if antisemetism now means the espousal of ideas damaging to Israel, an antisemite. The important thing is to remove the legitimate grounds for Muslim opposition to Israel. When the illegitimate grounds are all that remain, Israel will find that it’s just greatly improved its public image internationally.


18 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
zed
Israel, like the U.S., creates its own reality. If they say they got results, they got results.
Never happen. This is about the zero sum game for water. In this zero sum game there is no win-win position, required for equlibrium. There is a loose-loose position, which is the current situation.
The win-win solution requires supplying enough water for all. While possible, it’s so far out of the box it’s not discussed.
The Bush administration never learned that marketing is not a substitute for effective policy. Endless spin might change a few (or even a lot of) minds but won’t result in tangible progress. Early indications are that the Obama team combines marketing and policy in equal measure, we shall see if that approach yields a better result.
Three-four billion a year spent on armaments might instead be used to put a dent in the water problem.
This is a meme that needs to be hammered into the heads of the people in charge. PR doesn’t work when the results are bad. And PR isn’t necessary when the results are good. Fix the results and the PR will take care of itself. All the PR on Madison Ave won’t fix an Edsel, and right now Israel’s policy is the Mother of all Edsels.
hereafter to be known as the Clara Jane policy
“When the illegitimate grounds are all that remain”
Who is going to judge what’s “legitimate”? You?
$100 million?
One could give Israel several yes check offs if Israel refrained from doing what it has done/does to Lebanon.
If Israel decided to abide by rules of decency as occupier in West Bank and Gaza.
Had Israel chose not to attempt expungement of Palestine via methods of denying permits,denying visas,passports,legal deeds or other forms of official paperwork permission and free passage denial/humiliation/harassment.
Israel has not earned any valid or legitimate claim to having been wronged or the innocent victim over past thirty years if one randomly selects 1980 as start year for Israeli record of conduct in West Bank,Gaza or Lebanon.
The land grabs,demolitions,putting in place arbitrary checkpoints,segregated roads,malice and malevolent rule making and brutal suppression methods or just plain deathdealing of Palestinians by Israel makes Israel the victim how?
Israel’s attack on Gaza which the factual record of who did what,on what dates and who ginned up “reasons” to brutalize Gazans and kill Gazan children rightfully should have brought about a firm international condemnation of Israel. Israel earned it.
WashingtonDC seemingly still trying to find where the condemnation check box is.
Israel deserves reasonable support for being decent and showing valid moral and ethical awareness and conduct. Reasonable people could agree on this.
However in truth Israel is a 19th century throwback of colonialism trying to succeed in a part of the world where colonialism became very unfashionable after WW2.
Israel may pull off this colonialism foray but Israeli expansionism and a naked attempt to expunge Palestine will have to be halted.
It is hard to see thus far Israel gets this. Too bad for Israel.
$100 million?
How about giving the land grabs back,dismantle the illegal settlements and stop trying to cheat and kill off Palestinians out of a homeland.
Seems like a fair price for Israel to pay for Israel to be seen as being decent and truly worthy of fair and empowered valid support. Not the kind of support the rabid zealots,Israel Firsters,likudniks,racists,bigots and war maniacs bring.
Netanyahu seems set on going with the rabid mob. Sadly so for Israel.
MC Hammer?
Or if you could make up your mind and let everyone else do the same.
It is Thersday upstairs at the Mothership!
BREAKING: President Uses Teleprompter, Wingnuts Wet Selves In Perplexing Fit of Hilarity
Nah. Wrong winners.
Nah, don’t mean water for only one side.
No win-win possible?
Digg is open
The important thing is to remove the legitimate grounds for Muslim opposition to Israel. When the illegitimate grounds are all that remain, Israel will find that it’s just greatly improved its public image internationally.
Very wise, indeed. So wise one wonders why the obviousness of this does not penetrate into the bulk of the Israeli populace. There is an internal Israeli problem (with some good basis in history) because of fear and anger. That problem will never be resolved until the government leads – consistently and non-partisanly.
“What kills a skunk is the publicity it gives itself.” Abraham Lincoln
Israel has worked hard spinning their image for years especially here in the states. Not working so well anymore. Some of the MSM newspapers that have generally done the advertising/spin for the Israeli government are feeling the heat of discontent (folks flooding to the internet for more fair and balanced news on that conflict)
Wonder if Israel will hire Burson Marsteler to spin their image
Rachel on Burson Marsteler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xVsYc-y7IY
Too bad they are not considering abiding by International recognized borders, taking the wall off of Palestinian lands etc
“The important thing is to remove the legitimate grounds for Muslim opposition to Israel. When the illegitimate grounds are all that remain, Israel will find that it’s just greatly improved its public image internationally”
The problem is, the muslims, by and large, have been violently opposed to the existence of Israel since day 1. Afterall, the arabs (they really were not referrred to as Palestinians then)rejected the UN partition plan and 5 arab armies attacked Israel on day one in 1948, long before Israel controlled one inch of the west bank or east Jerusalem.
It’s like saying if the US removed ‘the legitimate’ grounds for Al Queda opposition to the USA….