The Obama Justice Department has asked a judge to dismiss charges against two former AIPAC lobbyists accused of receiving classified information from the Bush Pentagon and passing it on to journalists and Israeli government officials. Good.
Put aside whatever you may feel about AIPAC. The case amounted to the criminalization of extremely routine practices in Washington: acquiring and distributing information that’s overclassified. Technically, I published classified information last Monday when I reported that there was an undisclosed classified Office of Legal Counsel memorandum on torture from 2007. There’s a widespread recognition that way too much information is needlessly classified. Indeed, "Ninety-five percent of what we do shouldn’t be classified at all, or it should be a much lower level of classification," Joan Dempsey, a former senior CIA and Pentagon official, recently estimated, according to Secrecy News. Neither Steve Rosen nor Keith Weissman, the AIPAC lobbyists in question, were government employees. Even if we’re to take the Justice Department’s former line that the leak itself was felonious, they were never accused of being the sources of it, since they couldn’t have been. (That was a guy named Larry Franklin.)
During the Chas Freeman affair, when Steve Rosen was leading the charge against Freeman’s appointment to be chairman of the National Intelligence Council for alleged hostility to Israel, alleged disinterest in human rights, and insinuated nefarious loyalties to China and Saudi Arabia, I remarked that Rosen shouldn’t have gone after another pro-Israel lobbyist with whom he disagreed over Freeman while being wrapped up in the case. I shouldn’t have said that Rosen was under indictment for spying for Israel, since that was a misstatement of the case. The point that I should have made is that someone who was railroaded in this case, with its intimations of dual loyalty, should be circumspect about flinging such charges against other people. Maybe we can all take a deep breath here — doubtful, but maybe — and reflect that it’s good for everyone who desires openness in government that the flimsy charges against Weissman and Rosen are on their way out, regardless of the politics of the accused.
Crossposted to The Streak. Criticize my position all you want in comments, but I’m not in the mood to be called an AIPAC shill, OK? Such a thing would come as a great surprise to AIPAC.



4 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Do you have a ticket for the big dinner? Don’t go with Jane this year, she’s witty and loves a good chat, but in the daylight she
I’m also not a big AIPAC fan but I tend to agree that this is good news.
There is an old legal addage that says ‘hard cases made bad law.’ The AIPAC case, I have to grudgingly admit, would have been such a case. However, the actions of the AIPAC lobbyists has to be condemned. I can just hear the Likuddites cheering their apparent free pass at espionage. One unfortunate outcome of this situation is the appearance that one can get a free pass for spying for Israel. Someonw please tell me different.
Thank you, Spencer. I am small and mean enough that I can cheer this case being dismissed only because Justin Raimondo will not get to eat a single kernel of popcorn. The possibility of NSA contractors with strong ties to Israel only throws into greater relief what nickel and dime stuff this is.