Got my hands on an interesting document today. It’s the Afghan government’s Civilian Surge Plan that President Hamid Karzai plans to give to the Obama administration this week. And it calls for a whole lot of civilian advisers to build governmental capacity — probably more than what the U.S. can provide. Fresh out from the Washington Independent:
The document, finalized on April 21, presents a “total of 676 requests for technical advisors from 22 Government Ministries.” Positions would be based in the capital, Kabul, as well as out in the provinces, where the Afghan government has had a difficult time consistently providing services for its citizens. The technical assistance the Afghan government seeks are for a wide variety of government services, from agricultural assistance to civil engineering to medicine to social work. Those figures may be a requirement floor, not a ceiling, according to the document, which says its requests are “preliminary and can be expected to change in response to changing needs and additional information received from ministries.”
Some of the requests for advisers appeared to reflect Afghan priorities that the Obama administration has criticized. The Civilian Surge Plan calls for eight advisers across two ministries for anti-corruption efforts, as corruption has emerged as one of the most endemic weaknesses of the Afghan government. Yet for one agency, the Independent Directorate of Local Governance, the plan calls for 34 advisers for “public relations and donor coordination” and three more for “strategic communication and information management.” That figure is also greater than the 21 advisers sought for the Ministry of Counter-Narcotics, despite the central role drugs play in funding Afghan insurgent groups.



3 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
I have a different take, Spencer. It looks to me like there’s at least a plausible rationale for the priorities reflected in the requests for advisors which should be treated seriously by the US.
I can see why they’d be interested in support for “Local Governance” with an emphasis on stuff foreign advisors can do that the locals generally can’t — PR, donor coordination, strategic communication and info mgmnt. They actually have a lot of potential resources for local services from NATO governments, NGOs etc. But they’ve virtually no capacity — either in Kabul or at the local level — to use those resources well or communicate to the population what they’re doing and what should be expected of the government.
The big push everybody agrees is needed is to get decent services at the local level. Some of that has to do with improving security, but a lot is just getting basic programs delivered. And it will never get delivered from Kabul, so they’ll need support for building and sustaining local service delivery capacity.
Counter-narcotics isn’t any more important for the Kabul government than improving on the local governance stuff. And it’s not like the US itself has any coherent strategy, so just throwing lots of so-called Western experts, each with his or her own pet approach, isn’t necessarily the best use of resources.
So, you think the next activation of the Obama network isn’t going to be ‘Call your Congresscritter’ but ‘try this Foreign Service test’?
You know, there’s still unemployed former Obama campaigners…
I don’t dispute that need, but the disparity compared to other critical needs is rather striking.