One more thing really quickly about Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s ascension to commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan. On Friday, I blogged about changes in the command structure in Afghanistan emanating from, among other places, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff’s review of Afghanistan strategy. What I should have noted, in retrospect, is that McChrystal chaired that review. I don’t know this for certain by any stretch, but chances are that was an audition for the job.
According to this Wall Street Journal piece from Friday, one of McChrystal’s recommendations as part of that review is particularly interesting:
A military official familiar with the Pentagon’s recent moves said Gen. McChrystal, a former Green Beret, was picked to head the Afghan task force because of his experience in Iraq. There, as commander of special operations forces, he set up a system that sent troops back to the same neighborhoods when they returned to the theater — something the task force has suggested replicating in Afghanistan with general infantry soldiers.
On the one hand, that seems like an intuitively good idea. Everyone who’s ever deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan talks about having to spend their first few months of their tour learning the intricacies of their terrain — both the physical space and the more-complex “human terrain” of personages and their histories and interactions — another few months acting on it, and the final months transitioning out of it while showing a replacement unit the ropes. Why not just have units return to their old areas of responsibility?
On the other hand, two things. First, if you mess up, your return to the area may look to the locals like the mess-up is going to be institutionalized. And second, it’s at least possible that returning to the same place might cause a “Groundhog Day” effect in troops, dropping their morale levels off by making their tours seem repetitive? I’m not trying to adjudicate the question, just raising it. I can also see troops’ morale levels rising (within reason) because they’re returning to a part of the war that’s at least familiar.
In any event, that sort of thinking suggests that McChrystal has bought into the “human terrain” counterinsurgency concept, which holds that you have to get to know the locals intimately if you expect anything resembling success. Special Operators don’t often get enough credit for insights like that.
Crossposted to The Streak.



5 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Further re the timing of the decision, Elizabeth Bulmiller’s report includes:
So the timing of today’s press flurry may be a bit strange, but it’s been in the works awhile.
They may have wanted to avoid announcing a switch on the US side until after the DC meetings with Karzi and Zardari. They had enough on their press plate for managing messages coming out of the trilaterals. Didn’t want to muddy things with concurrent speculation about why there’s a change of US command in Kabul.
That makes sense.
Hmmm. Abu Muq suggests there were more grumbles and a wider discomfort with McKiernan than was generally apparent. Though that may just be within the crowd he hangs out with.
He also points out something I also picked up on. Gates was pretty brutal: “asked for his resignation”. No bureaucratic pretence about shifting assignments, etc. And it’s being made clear that it was ultimately Obama’s decision.
Though I’m puzzled that Gates framed it as a request rather than simply “we’ve decided to change commanders”. Surely the Prez and Gates have the authority to reassign Generals without requesting their cooperation?
Anyhow, perhaps this goes back to the transition. I imagine O wasn’t overly impressed when McKiernan couldn’t explain what he’d do with all those extra troops he was calling for. O gave him only a bit more than half of what he wanted.
Still, first Calderon (small potatoes, but still) and now McKiernan. Kinda sends a message about what the guys at the top will do if their performance expectations aren’t met.
This is clearly the move outlined in the WSJ article, right? Abu M seems to have missed the heads-up there. Good catch, Attackerman.
When McChrystal was the head of the Joint Special Operations Command in Iraq, units under him ran a torture network all over the country, including in one of Saddam Hussein’s former torture centers.
Unless the leopard has changed his spots pretty thoroughly, I’m not seeing a bright future for the metastasizing war / covert ops / occupation debacle in Afghanistan and Pakistan.