Tom Ricks didn’t like me noting that Alex Strick van Linschoten and Felix Kuehn are probably the only two independent journalists living in Kandahar. He even called it "bullshit." What follows, however, is just bizarre:
As opposed, I reckon, to the dozens of MSM hacks who line up for frosty Taj beers by 3 pm each day at the bar of the Kandahar Foreign Correspondents Club. Bonus points for the four-barreled name featuring a "van." Didn’t young van Linschoten’s cousin Winston prep at St. Paul’s, and later get involved in a regretful scene at a Princeton boathouse with two Emma Willard girls and a wolverine that had imbibed too much champagne?
In reality, I am told the best bar in Afghanistan outside Kabul remains the Bamboo in Jalalabad. They also can arrange a tour of Tora Bora for you, but the heavy security costs extra.
Ooookay. So the majority of journalists operating in Kandahar province live at KAF and work at the behest of the military there. Sometimes MSM reporters venture into Kandahar City itself—Dexter Filkins notably spent several days there and noted that he didn’t see any Canadian patrols around the city—but they are not based there full time, nor do they speak Dari and Pashto as Alex does. (And what’s with him mocking Alex—who is Dutch—for having a Dutch name?)
If Ricks knows of any other journalists—independent or no—who live in Kandahar City full time (Sarah Chayes does not count, as she no longer works as a journalist), I’d like to hear about them. Otherwise, he could try shutting his fucking mouth and acting like reading Free Range International is a sufficient excuse for wit. (FRI is the blog of Tim Lynch, whose company also runs the Taj, which Ricks links to, by way of saying he "is told" rather than actually seeing for himself.) Or, you know, he could try not being a dick about something so very trivial.
How completely bizarre.



9 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Unless you guys have a history I can’t see any obvious reason for the dig at you or your friend.
Straight guess, maybe he thought you were trying to throw shade on MSM journalists by emphasizing your friend is an independent journalist?
Either way I have to agree that it does come across as dickish.
I dunno. TR seems to feel somewhat defensive about his bona fides in country, especially since he’s been drawing some incoming for his “Petraeus Worship”. It seems like every now and then he kind of goes all FMJ on something or somebody of minor consequence, seemingly for no other purpose than to have had the dust-up in the first place.
He seems to endorse the “Ledeen Doctrine” for writers: Every now and then he needs to pick up some crappy little blogger/reporter and throw him against the wall to show he means business…
mikey
Oh, No. No Ricks-dicking allowed ’round here.
Mikey, I’m aware of the allegations about Ricks, and don’t really have an opinion on them. He reports on soldiers—fine, you don’t need to live outside the wire to do that.
What’s so weird is, I don’t think I’ve ever really said anything about him. So why he would interpret my comment about Alex as a dig against him is… well, bizarre is the only way to put it. Moreover, you have to have a point if you’re going to “throw someone against the wall” (”Walling”). He didn’t, aside from making fun of Alex’s name. How dare he be Dutch!
What’s even weirder is, he and I have been on the same email lists before, discussing some studies. He never struck me as a dick then. Just this one thing was totally dickish.
Ok…”four-barreled” is an invocation of stereotype of Dutch drunkenness(see: Dutch courage), and also a subtle anti-intellectual dig(’four’ from ‘four-eyes’). The writer continues with a dual insinuation; reinforcing that Mr Van Linschoten is Dutch and positing an unrelated but concomitant callowness. The passage continues, inventing a Callow coastal elite straw-man relative and then envisioning an embarrassing scenario set in an effete location and involving this straw-man with two similarly (presumably also callow, perhaps excessively so) coastal elite straw-women, all witnessed by an existential metaphor. And it is this metaphor that draws the illusory anecdote back to the initial criticism: the “wolverine” has been a symbol of uniquely American courage (in contrast to the initial invocation of Dutch courage) since at least 1984, and here we see this symbol brought low by…alcohol! And not just any alcohol, but “champagne”, a elite and above all French alcohol. And so we resolve back to Ricks’s image of van Linschoten as a drunken Dutchman(or possibly Belgian). The whole point of this exercise in calumny by Ricks being to indicate that there is no daylight between the natural behavior of van Linschoten and “the dozens of MSM hacks who line up for frosty Taj beers by 3 pm each day…” Mr. Ricks then proceeds to show his legitimacy in making such a claim by demonstrating his knowledge of Afghan bars and asserting the supremacy of his knowledge in that field. Mr Ricks, of course, is of English descent. This perhaps explains his lack of distinction between the various Continental cultures(I would suggest a northern Gewurztraminer in place of champagne).
/pretentiousness
(Full Disclosure: this did not end up being as much BS as it was intended to be) (Alternate Full Disclosure: I have never had a Dutch friend I did not make fun of for being Dutch)
Oh no, sir, the last thing you need when “walling” someone is an independent point. The only point in establishing alpha male dominance is to dominate. In fact, having a reason beyond pure dominance can actually be counterproductive, as it indicates to your potential rivals that they are safe from you until they give you a clear justification to pound them. The best bullies and abusers separate out their violence as a complete berserk state with no connection to the surrounding reality(as Ricks does here: “Just this one thing was totally dickish.“). Such bullies also tend to feel emotional slights quite dearly, but sublimate them until a connection between the wound and the lashing out is not obvious; Spencer quite openly adores Ricks, is it possible Spencer inadvertently snubbed him when asking around for guestbloggers?
No idea what Ricks is talking about. I’ve had my say on his blog in the comments. If he was trying to be funny, he clearly failed the clown school entrance exam. If he was trying to be clever, he failed. Problem is, I just don’t see what point he is trying to make which leads me to the conclusion he’s a lousy journalist. And just what are Foreign Policy doing tolerating garbage like that on their site? I’d have that crap scrubbed off frontlineclub.com within minutes.
Oh relax. I just thought the lede in the item sounded pompous. Still do.
Cheers,
Tom
On balance, Tom, you provide a valuable voice in the conversation.
But somehow, I’m not certain you should be assigned the role of “arbiter of pomposity”…
Just sayin…
mikey