The Obama administration has been, so far, admirably firm in the face of Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s attempts to soften the administration’s position that settlement construction in the West Bank has to be stopped. Yet some ultra-conservative pischers think that they’ve stumbled upon a useful way of changing President Obama’s mind, according to Ha’aretz. A fringe protest of 130 outside the American consulate in Jerusalem featured such gems as this:
Far right activist Itamar Ben-Gvir, who attended the protest, told Channel 10 that "it appears that we’ve arrived at a red line, which has already been crossed by the most anti-Semitic American president."
Yes, apparently opposing the expansion of settlements is enough to make you an anti-semite. This makes, according to one recent poll, 60 percent of American Jews anti-semites. And we’re not even talking about the destruction of existing settlements yet. To get a sense of how asinine this position is, consider that if a hypothetical U.S. administration made the end of settlement expansion the centerpiece of its Israel/Palestine strategy, it would still be conceding hundreds of thousands of Israeli settlers in the West Bank, with all the Israeli military and other infrastructure that goes to support them, which all but forecloses the prospect of an independent Palestine. And now if you give the settlers that, you’re a Jew hater. Oh, and these racists are distributing the flyer you see accompanying this post.
Again, these demonstrators are a fringe phenomenon. But it should be clear to Israelis by now that these people are going to lead them into an abyss of international isolation at a time when demographic trends among Palestinians between the Mediterranean and the Jordan favor a future in which they outnumber Jews, heralding the real destruction of the state of Israel. Calling the leader of Israel’s major international patron an antisemite for possessing more foresight into the future than they do is more than just a disgusting slander, it demonstrates frivolousness with both history and with the future of Israel itself. Conservative American Jewish commentators who parrot this despicable and craven line of assault will also demonstrate their own irrelevance and idiocy. Who’ll be the first? Bob Kagan already has a head start.
Update: Obama in Cairo. Rank anti-Semitism:
America’s strong bonds with Israel are well known. This bond is unbreakable. It is based upon cultural and historical ties, and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.
Around the world, the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries, and anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust. Tomorrow, I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich. Six million Jews were killed – more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. Denying that fact is baseless, ignorant, and hateful. Threatening Israel with destruction – or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews – is deeply wrong, and only serves to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve.
Login Here




18 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
The idiots who made that pic need to go back to wingnut school. Red keffiyeh means Islamo-Socialist-terrorist, black is for secular moderates. I don’t expect Chuck Redneck from Antitaxarkana to know that, but Israelis should have some passing familiarity with Palestinian politics, even Israeli hicks.
Two points. First, all the Israelis should just come and live in the US. I say this purely as a partisan; we could use the votes(a couple hundred racist homesteaders with guns aren’t going to stick out here either). Second, if all the Semites don’t get their act together and stop fighting amongst themselves, they’ll never stop the vast Anglo-American Conspiracy from taking all of their languages away.
The next time Israel and the press bring up those “oral understandings” that allow Israel to continue expanding settlements, remember that the only American official vouching for them is Elliott Abrams, convicted perjurer. I wish someone would ask the authors of these two articles, Glenn Kessler and Ethan Bronner, whether it is a violation of journalistic standards to use Elliott Abrams as the sole US official to bolster the Israeli arguments without telling us that he was convicted of lying to Congress so that we can appropriately judge his credibility.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..01536.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06…..srael.html
Without comment on a very overheated issue, the difference between anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic is understood by grade school children.
And on the anthropological side of things, the difference between the Semite Jews and Semite Palestinians is insignificant.
Thanks, Endymion
I learned something new from that. Red Kaffiyeh=danger. Got it.
And I’d have to agree, you’d think Israelis would know this stuff. Maybe it was done by an AIP*C sock-puppet?
Funny Wheelie Diva
I still can’t quite understand how “stealing” someone else’s land never makes it into the TradMed’s reporting.
We could do quite a few great things with the money we give to Israel. And I have never understood why it is our job to prop up their economy – that’s my tax dollars and I would rather feed hungry people right here.
Calling the demonstrators a ‘fringe phenomenon’ is dubious.
Do we have to wait for Abe Foxman to confirm their charge before it’s mainstream? It shouldn’t be long.
And more anti-Semitic than Carter, who’d a thunk it?
I’m guessing that an Aipac rep will show up here soon to explain why Israel needs to keep building settlements and displacing Palestinians.
Why do American Jews hate the Jews?
OT: Abramoff seems to be having a bit of a problem, along with everybody else these days. Welcome to the real world, Jack!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200…..tax_refund
So, in a two-state solution, those settlers would become citizens of Palestine, i.e., Palestinians, by definition. And, what’s so wrong with that?
This is not true. Israel will simply become best case scenario, a binational state; worst case, an apartheid state. The two state solution died in the 90s with Oslo. We need to keep straight that while the Israeli policy of apartheid is unjust and must fail. The standard two state solution isn’t realistic either. We need to stop these false debates and start talking about solutions that are grounded in the real world.
Wow. Talk about desparation. I mean, it’s one thing to not really acknowledge Obama on the whole settlement issue, we all figured that would happen with Netanyahu as PM, but these demonstrators are absolutely bonkers. Antisemetic for opposing settlement expansion? Well, I guess if that’s the lone qualification for being an antisemite these days then file me under jew hater because I see the settlements, like the rest of the world does, as highly illegal and immoral and feel they should stop immediately and be forced to pull out of settlements in West Bank and Gaza. But hey, what do I know? According to them, I’m an antisemite.
It would depend upon negotiations as to where the borders of a new Palestine should be drawn.
At least we have a near-term precedent for how we should treat an apartheid single-state solution. Granted, the Union of South Africa was white-supremist state and they were a relatively small and inconsequential minority in the U.S. compared to the number and power of the American Zionists.
If I were a right-wing Jew I would be careful about throwing around the anti-semitic connection with anti-Zionism, because if the American people come to believe that their security, which they do not equate with Israel’s, depends on the Israeli’s giving back the land they stole, they may well become anti-Semitic. These people are putting a loaded shot-gun to their own head.
Expect the spotlight on Obama to continue intensifying and his actions to be VERY critically judged, even among the left-leaning media outlets.
I am not saying there is a great Jewish conspiracy. I am, however, saying that Jews are very, very over-represented (compared to their population) in the American media. This is an understandably emotional issue for many American Jews and anything concerning Israel or the middle east generally will get top billing in Tv and print news.
You’ll start to see alot of pro-Israel hard-liners like Professor Dershowitz on TV more regularly the more in depth this gets.
Bush probably did make some private agreement. Who cares about an agreement Bush made behind the backs of the American people.