Yes, it’s true — Steve Hayes of The Weekly Standard is 100 percent right about a bizarre op-ed from Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett contending that Ahmadinejad won the election fairly. For a two very brief rundowns of the myriad problems with the vote, see this Juan Cole post and, more circuitously, this Jon Cohen post. It really won’t do to say, as the Leveretts write, that critics are dismissing Ahmadinejad’s contention of victory “without any evidence.”
Of course, if Flynt Leverett is, as Jeffrey Goldberg writes, “Ahmadinejad’s American apologist,” than that judgment applies to, oh, Max Boot, Daniel “Rooting For Ahmadinejad” Pipes, Jonathan Tobin, and everyone else who’s finding silver linings for the vicious way in which the regime is brutalizing its dissenters. The worse is not the better. Hoping for a heightening of the contradictions is incompatible with a professed belief in human rights.
Crossposted to The Streak.
Login Here




3 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
I think we are all getting ahead of ourselves. Juan Cole has a viable post but it’s still all speculation about the actual results. Perhaps a little perspective, and patience, on the outcome of such contentious elections would be prudent. We all want justice in Iran, even if it is a pipe dream. That should not allow us, whether we be Hayes or Leverett, to make wishes seem like fact.
A wise caveat. But I think it still does apply more to the Leveretts than to Hayes, in fairness. They were the ones who wrote definitively that there wasn’t evidence that the election was stolen.
Bargainer beware.