So he tells the New York Times. This renders inoperative something I said to Jezebel’s Megan Carpentier this morning. We’ll see how this plays out in practice, but Gen. McChrystal appears to be emphasizing this in a thorough manner:
“Air power contains the seeds of our own destruction if we do not use it responsibly,” General McChrystal told a group of his senior officers during a video conference last week. “We can lose this fight.”
“When we shoot into a compound, that should only be for the protection of our forces,” he said. “I want everyone to understand that.”
He didn’t go that far at his confirmation hearing earlier this month, but he said that the mark of progress would be the number of civilians spared from violence.
Crossposted to The Streak.
Login Here




1 Comment
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
I’m having a lot of trouble buying this. How’s it supposed to work?
A platoon is in contact, taking fire from several points in a village. They have a solid perimeter and some fire support from a couple mortars or maybe a fifty, so they’re not going to get overrun, but they’re taking heavy fire and have a couple casualties they need to dust off. The relief company gets ambushed and hit with an IED and is delayed. The LT calls for CAS. What’s the controller going to say? Nope, sorry young man, we can’t hit that town, the General says no air anymore. Maybe you should send a squad in to drive them out, huh?
Don’t get me wrong. McChrystal’s not just right, he’s OBVIOUSLY right. But anytime somebody on the ground calls for air support, he’s still going to get it because, really, who’s going to say no?
mikey