Hey, so here’s a question: would it be better for you if I liveblogged the thing or live-tweeted it? I’m thinking tweet. But you tell me.
Also, don’t miss this Marcy point:
[Brennan] was also, apparently, intimately involved in the illegal activities of the Bush Administration, particularly Bush’s domestic surveillance program.
So soft power is all well and good–provided we make a more competent attempt at it than Karen Hughes was able to muster. But will it move beyond the abuse of power Brennan was involved in under Bush?
Brennan’s taking questions today. Just saying.
Update: Hi from CSIS. It’s 10:25 and Twitter is down. So much for my plan. Ah well. Come over to the Windy for fun fun livebloggery.



3 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
So, I’d vote for liveblog. I feel like Brennan 140 characters at a time isn’t going to do the experience justice.
You can’t say ‘twitter’ without ‘twit.’
You were totally right. I ended up doing a lot of extensive quotation. Twitter would have held me back.