It’s some good jujitsu: accepting the technological premises of missile defense advocates to argue that the planned Poland/Czech Republic-based system is a relic before it’s built.
Update: You know who said something absolutely brainless? Yeah you do.
Update 2: Spray-tanned Congressman sprays idiocy on missiles.



2 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Spencer, while I agree with the administrations shift in focus (to Iran/Mid East), from following the issue I see missile defense as a proven failure technologically. My back-of-envelope calculations indicate missile intercept testing results are
You’re closer to this work, of course, so could you provide an update on the results of missile defense technology as a whole and specifically missile intercept success rate?
TIA!
If there is a better demonstration of the reality-challenged nature of American politics than the insistence that missile defense is worth spending taxpayer money on (while, of course, health care is not) I don’t know what it is.
Every billion dollars worth of missile defense R&D is defeated by less than ten million dollars of re-entry vehicle R&D. Sure, boost phase works. Let me know how you’re going to accomplish that…
M