<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drones &amp; Alternatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:27:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13893</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13893</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Somehow I think Pres. Obama would be more accomodating to the wishes of Republicans who want us to leave or maintain only a small presence in Afghanistan if they would only vote in significant numbers for the healthcare reform legislation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some might say such a horse trading deal would be immoral, but is it. Where are more lives likely to be lost or saved? Would such a deal be better for Americans?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Such questions should probably never be asked because people aren’t especially good at answering them and that’s an embarrassment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On AfPak specifically, the question has always been whether we have destroyed Al Qaeda. The Taliban are not one and the same as AQ and they aren’t likely to be a threat to us if we leave one of them alive. It was mostly the Egyptian al Zawahiri and the Saudi-Yemeni bin Laden who wanted to hurt America because of our presence in the Middle East and our support of Israel. The Taliban have never shown a strong interest in fighting us over that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second, if Al Qaeda is still strong, then why would we have so much trouble finding them when they move with the Taliban from Pak to Af? Seems McChrystal needs new glasses, unless it’s someone further up the food chain who has made it more difficult for McChrystal’s Af forces to do the job properly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought we were supposed to be the anvil to Pakistan’s hammer. They would attack and push the Taliban &amp; AQ in Pakistan and if the T &amp; AQ ran back to Afghanistan we would be there to crush them (as anvils do). Where has the anvil effect been?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We know there are jihadists and we know the Taliban are very proud and will fight a very long time (even in the face of big defeats). Their recent big battle in Afghanistan’s north shows they know how to prepare and attack. Our 145 fighters lost 10, they had 700 and lost about 100. We lost 10, they lost 100. I’d say that if we can fight them and have our resources, then we can win. So, why haven’t we had more battles until recently when there has been talk of our retreat? Is it that the enemy wants to hit us and then watch us leave, so they can claim victory?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s too much ego involved. We have to decide what to do based on whether we’re done with Al Qaeda. They attacked us (presumably), not Saddam Hussein or the Taliban.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I think Pres. Obama would be more accomodating to the wishes of Republicans who want us to leave or maintain only a small presence in Afghanistan if they would only vote in significant numbers for the healthcare reform legislation.</p>
<p>Some might say such a horse trading deal would be immoral, but is it. Where are more lives likely to be lost or saved? Would such a deal be better for Americans?</p>
<p>Such questions should probably never be asked because people aren’t especially good at answering them and that’s an embarrassment.</p>
<p>On AfPak specifically, the question has always been whether we have destroyed Al Qaeda. The Taliban are not one and the same as AQ and they aren’t likely to be a threat to us if we leave one of them alive. It was mostly the Egyptian al Zawahiri and the Saudi-Yemeni bin Laden who wanted to hurt America because of our presence in the Middle East and our support of Israel. The Taliban have never shown a strong interest in fighting us over that.</p>
<p>Second, if Al Qaeda is still strong, then why would we have so much trouble finding them when they move with the Taliban from Pak to Af? Seems McChrystal needs new glasses, unless it’s someone further up the food chain who has made it more difficult for McChrystal’s Af forces to do the job properly.</p>
<p>I thought we were supposed to be the anvil to Pakistan’s hammer. They would attack and push the Taliban &amp; AQ in Pakistan and if the T &amp; AQ ran back to Afghanistan we would be there to crush them (as anvils do). Where has the anvil effect been?</p>
<p>We know there are jihadists and we know the Taliban are very proud and will fight a very long time (even in the face of big defeats). Their recent big battle in Afghanistan’s north shows they know how to prepare and attack. Our 145 fighters lost 10, they had 700 and lost about 100. We lost 10, they lost 100. I’d say that if we can fight them and have our resources, then we can win. So, why haven’t we had more battles until recently when there has been talk of our retreat? Is it that the enemy wants to hit us and then watch us leave, so they can claim victory?</p>
<p>There’s too much ego involved. We have to decide what to do based on whether we’re done with Al Qaeda. They attacked us (presumably), not Saddam Hussein or the Taliban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeanOR</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13892</link>
		<dc:creator>DeanOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13892</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Same old-same old war propaganda. Like it has never happened before, and we have never heard it before and never learn.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old-same old war propaganda. Like it has never happened before, and we have never heard it before and never learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: researcher</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13891</link>
		<dc:creator>researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13891</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;fools this war is about the industrial military complex that controls wash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;even obama has fallen into line with their desires for continual wars for profits&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;makes one wonder who controls the country&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;obama may only be a figure head&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;we will be in afghan for a long time to come&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;after all the chinese are paying for the war not the american taxpayer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;we dont want health care for the sick and needy but wars for profits americans love that&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the only thing we make anymore is wars&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the christian nation always at war&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;christianity died on the cross.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fools this war is about the industrial military complex that controls wash</p>
<p>even obama has fallen into line with their desires for continual wars for profits</p>
<p>makes one wonder who controls the country</p>
<p>obama may only be a figure head</p>
<p>we will be in afghan for a long time to come</p>
<p>after all the chinese are paying for the war not the american taxpayer</p>
<p>we dont want health care for the sick and needy but wars for profits americans love that</p>
<p>the only thing we make anymore is wars</p>
<p>the christian nation always at war</p>
<p>christianity died on the cross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ondelette</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13890</link>
		<dc:creator>ondelette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13890</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;First comment among probably a couple. “&lt;em&gt;Unsavory characters in Central Asia&lt;/em&gt;” cannot refer to the ISI, which is Pakistani, and therefore not in Central Asia, which &lt;em&gt;starts to the north of Afghanistan&lt;/em&gt; (it’s the “-stans”). And one other thing, then I have to go think about more of what you said: The better intelligence in Pakistan is Pakistani intelligence. The reason the strikes have gotten so much more accurate and less intolerable since May 5th is that the Pakistanis are calling them in. One reason that might require a presence to the north is that the Pakistanis will change strategy if the balance of power changes in Afghanistan, because they are involved in a hegemonic struggle with other regional powers (the Taliban are their projection into that struggle). More later.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First comment among probably a couple. “<em>Unsavory characters in Central Asia</em>” cannot refer to the ISI, which is Pakistani, and therefore not in Central Asia, which <em>starts to the north of Afghanistan</em> (it’s the “-stans”). And one other thing, then I have to go think about more of what you said: The better intelligence in Pakistan is Pakistani intelligence. The reason the strikes have gotten so much more accurate and less intolerable since May 5th is that the Pakistanis are calling them in. One reason that might require a presence to the north is that the Pakistanis will change strategy if the balance of power changes in Afghanistan, because they are involved in a hegemonic struggle with other regional powers (the Taliban are their projection into that struggle). More later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shekissesfrogs</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13888</link>
		<dc:creator>shekissesfrogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13888</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s not about OUR terror-  the oil, the giant &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.domain-b.com/industry/Mining/20090310_afghanistan.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ANYAK&lt;/a&gt; copper deposit that’s been auctioned off by the IMF and World bank, others are currently underway. NATO forces are guaranteeing safety for capitalist enterprises. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The open for business sign has been set out, but unfortunately, the current residents do not feel like selling their heritage. Our wise men don’t believe in the right of self determinism, and therefore, terror will need to be administered until they agree that serfdom is in their longterm self interests. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All the contorting and twisting will not make these lies fit the story line they need us to believe - that is their real problem. Some things never change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.online-literature.com/kipling/922/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The White Man’s Burden&lt;/a&gt; by Rudyard Kipling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take up the White Man’s burden–&lt;br /&gt;
Send forth the best ye breed–&lt;br /&gt;
Go, bind your sons to exile&lt;br /&gt;
To serve your captives’ need;&lt;br /&gt;
To wait, in heavy harness,&lt;br /&gt;
On fluttered folk and wild–&lt;br /&gt;
Your new-caught sullen peoples,&lt;br /&gt;
Half devil and half child.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take up the White Man’s burden–&lt;br /&gt;
In patience to abide,&lt;br /&gt;
To veil the threat of terror&lt;br /&gt;
And check the show of pride;&lt;br /&gt;
By open speech and simple,&lt;br /&gt;
An hundred times made plain,&lt;br /&gt;
To seek another’s profit&lt;br /&gt;
And work another’s gain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take up the White Man’s burden–&lt;br /&gt;
The savage wars of peace–&lt;br /&gt;
Fill full the mouth of Famine,&lt;br /&gt;
And bid the sickness cease;&lt;br /&gt;
And when your goal is nearest&lt;br /&gt;
(The end for others sought)&lt;br /&gt;
Watch sloth and heathen folly&lt;br /&gt;
Bring all your hope to nought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take up the White Man’s burden–&lt;br /&gt;
No iron rule of kings,&lt;br /&gt;
But toil of serf and sweeper–&lt;br /&gt;
The tale of common things.&lt;br /&gt;
The ports ye shall not enter,&lt;br /&gt;
The roads ye shall not tread,&lt;br /&gt;
Go, make them with your living&lt;br /&gt;
And mark them with your dead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take up the White Man’s burden,&lt;br /&gt;
And reap his old reward–&lt;br /&gt;
The blame of those ye better&lt;br /&gt;
The hate of those ye guard–&lt;br /&gt;
The cry of hosts ye humour&lt;br /&gt;
(Ah, slowly!) toward the light:–&lt;br /&gt;
“Why brought ye us from bondage,&lt;br /&gt;
Our loved Egyptian night?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take up the White Man’s burden–&lt;br /&gt;
Ye dare not stoop to less–&lt;br /&gt;
Nor call too loud on Freedom&lt;br /&gt;
To cloak your weariness.&lt;br /&gt;
By all ye will or whisper,&lt;br /&gt;
By all ye leave or do,&lt;br /&gt;
The silent sullen peoples&lt;br /&gt;
Shall weigh your God and you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take up the White Man’s burden!&lt;br /&gt;
Have done with childish days–&lt;br /&gt;
The lightly-proffered laurel,&lt;br /&gt;
The easy ungrudged praise:&lt;br /&gt;
Comes now, to search your manhood&lt;br /&gt;
Through all the thankless years,&lt;br /&gt;
Cold, edged with dear-bought wisdom,&lt;br /&gt;
The judgment of your peers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not about OUR terror-  the oil, the giant <a href="http://www.domain-b.com/industry/Mining/20090310_afghanistan.html" rel="nofollow">ANYAK</a> copper deposit that’s been auctioned off by the IMF and World bank, others are currently underway. NATO forces are guaranteeing safety for capitalist enterprises. </p>
<p>The open for business sign has been set out, but unfortunately, the current residents do not feel like selling their heritage. Our wise men don’t believe in the right of self determinism, and therefore, terror will need to be administered until they agree that serfdom is in their longterm self interests. </p>
<p>All the contorting and twisting will not make these lies fit the story line they need us to believe &#8211; that is their real problem. Some things never change.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.online-literature.com/kipling/922/" rel="nofollow">The White Man’s Burden</a> by Rudyard Kipling</p>
<p>Take up the White Man’s burden–<br />
Send forth the best ye breed–<br />
Go, bind your sons to exile<br />
To serve your captives’ need;<br />
To wait, in heavy harness,<br />
On fluttered folk and wild–<br />
Your new-caught sullen peoples,<br />
Half devil and half child.</p>
<p>Take up the White Man’s burden–<br />
In patience to abide,<br />
To veil the threat of terror<br />
And check the show of pride;<br />
By open speech and simple,<br />
An hundred times made plain,<br />
To seek another’s profit<br />
And work another’s gain.</p>
<p>Take up the White Man’s burden–<br />
The savage wars of peace–<br />
Fill full the mouth of Famine,<br />
And bid the sickness cease;<br />
And when your goal is nearest<br />
(The end for others sought)<br />
Watch sloth and heathen folly<br />
Bring all your hope to nought.</p>
<p>Take up the White Man’s burden–<br />
No iron rule of kings,<br />
But toil of serf and sweeper–<br />
The tale of common things.<br />
The ports ye shall not enter,<br />
The roads ye shall not tread,<br />
Go, make them with your living<br />
And mark them with your dead.</p>
<p>Take up the White Man’s burden,<br />
And reap his old reward–<br />
The blame of those ye better<br />
The hate of those ye guard–<br />
The cry of hosts ye humour<br />
(Ah, slowly!) toward the light:–<br />
“Why brought ye us from bondage,<br />
Our loved Egyptian night?”</p>
<p>Take up the White Man’s burden–<br />
Ye dare not stoop to less–<br />
Nor call too loud on Freedom<br />
To cloak your weariness.<br />
By all ye will or whisper,<br />
By all ye leave or do,<br />
The silent sullen peoples<br />
Shall weigh your God and you.</p>
<p>Take up the White Man’s burden!<br />
Have done with childish days–<br />
The lightly-proffered laurel,<br />
The easy ungrudged praise:<br />
Comes now, to search your manhood<br />
Through all the thankless years,<br />
Cold, edged with dear-bought wisdom,<br />
The judgment of your peers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmull</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13887</link>
		<dc:creator>bmull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13887</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think we should leave. But if Obama can have a small footprint cointerinsurrgency operation in Afghanistan I’m okay with that too, as long as we’ve got a “trigger” for leaving in the event the dollar cost and body count remain high.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should leave. But if Obama can have a small footprint cointerinsurrgency operation in Afghanistan I’m okay with that too, as long as we’ve got a “trigger” for leaving in the event the dollar cost and body count remain high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pastfedup</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13885</link>
		<dc:creator>pastfedup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13885</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My reply was to shootthatarrow at 23.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My reply was to shootthatarrow at 23.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pastfedup</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13884</link>
		<dc:creator>pastfedup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13884</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You have exactly the right perspective, the moral perspective.  Too bad our political leaders are almost totally lacking a moral compass.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have exactly the right perspective, the moral perspective.  Too bad our political leaders are almost totally lacking a moral compass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13882</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13882</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sept. 23 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/International/23-Sep-2009/Poll-reflects-Afghan-war-doubts--WSJ&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WSJ&lt;/a&gt; poll: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Americans are pessimistic about the prospects of victory in Afghanistan; 59% say they are feeling less confident that the war will come to a successful conclusion. And 51% say they would oppose sending more troops to the conflict.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sept. 22 &lt;a href=&quot;http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1349/support-falls-afghanistan-war-troop-removal&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pew&lt;/a&gt; poll:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, half of Americans (50%) say military troops should remain in Afghanistan until the situation has stabilized, while 43% favor removing U.S. and NATO troops as soon as possible. In June, 57% favored keeping U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, while 38% favored their removal as soon as possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sept. 15 &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/15/poll-support-for-afghan-war-at-all-time-low/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CNN&lt;/a&gt; poll:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released Tuesday morning indicates that 39 percent of Americans favor the war in Afghanistan, with 58 percent opposed to the mission.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sept. 23 <a href="http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/International/23-Sep-2009/Poll-reflects-Afghan-war-doubts--WSJ" rel="nofollow">WSJ</a> poll: </p>
<p>Americans are pessimistic about the prospects of victory in Afghanistan; 59% say they are feeling less confident that the war will come to a successful conclusion. And 51% say they would oppose sending more troops to the conflict.</p>
<p>Sept. 22 <a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1349/support-falls-afghanistan-war-troop-removal" rel="nofollow">Pew</a> poll:</p>
<p>Currently, half of Americans (50%) say military troops should remain in Afghanistan until the situation has stabilized, while 43% favor removing U.S. and NATO troops as soon as possible. In June, 57% favored keeping U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, while 38% favored their removal as soon as possible.</p>
<p>Sept. 15 <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/15/poll-support-for-afghan-war-at-all-time-low/" rel="nofollow">CNN</a> poll:</p>
<p>A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released Tuesday morning indicates that 39 percent of Americans favor the war in Afghanistan, with 58 percent opposed to the mission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shootthatarrow</title>
		<link>http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13881</link>
		<dc:creator>shootthatarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/10/06/drones-alternatives/#comment-13881</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Human beings being human beings how would Americans living in Iowa,Vermont,Texas or Oregon like it if some country half way or farther around the planet was flying drones over them and doing missile attacks and killing civilians willy nilly? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As human beings how would they react? How should they react?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With anger? Anger mixed with large doses of daily dread? Fear mixed with anger mixed with resentment of being subjected to death by someone who does not even have the guts to present themselves in person? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WashingtonDC deserves the blowback it is getting in/from Afghanistan being WashingtonDC should reap the whirlwind it sowed,sows or has sown ( see who created Taliban back when Soviet Union was doing what Americans are doing now in Afghanistan).  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whatever WashingtonDC is up to over or in Pakistan surely will yield blowback too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gosh darn how come again? Why are Afghanis and Pakistanis fighting back and resisting and killing Americans who are in Afghanistan and Pakistan killing Afghanis and Pakistanis? Don’t they know that is not allowed? Americans can fly into and over countries and kill but people who live in those countries are not allowed to fight back. Now why is that? Why is this so?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is not just the stupidity. It is the arrogance it comes wrapped in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WashingtonDC should get out of Asia. Get out now. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;President Obama? Do you think you could maybe do the stand up guy thing here? For a change?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human beings being human beings how would Americans living in Iowa,Vermont,Texas or Oregon like it if some country half way or farther around the planet was flying drones over them and doing missile attacks and killing civilians willy nilly? </p>
<p>As human beings how would they react? How should they react?</p>
<p>With anger? Anger mixed with large doses of daily dread? Fear mixed with anger mixed with resentment of being subjected to death by someone who does not even have the guts to present themselves in person? </p>
<p>WashingtonDC deserves the blowback it is getting in/from Afghanistan being WashingtonDC should reap the whirlwind it sowed,sows or has sown ( see who created Taliban back when Soviet Union was doing what Americans are doing now in Afghanistan).  </p>
<p>Whatever WashingtonDC is up to over or in Pakistan surely will yield blowback too.</p>
<p>Gosh darn how come again? Why are Afghanis and Pakistanis fighting back and resisting and killing Americans who are in Afghanistan and Pakistan killing Afghanis and Pakistanis? Don’t they know that is not allowed? Americans can fly into and over countries and kill but people who live in those countries are not allowed to fight back. Now why is that? Why is this so?</p>
<p>It is not just the stupidity. It is the arrogance it comes wrapped in.</p>
<p>WashingtonDC should get out of Asia. Get out now. </p>
<p>President Obama? Do you think you could maybe do the stand up guy thing here? For a change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
