I made a mistake in this post and I hope my friend will forgive me. I stopped reading former AIPAC and Israeli D.C. embassy official Lenny Ben-David’s vile screed against J Street after he descended into racist innuendo that the organization is suspect because it takes money from (gasp) human beings of Arabian heritage. Had I read further, I would have seen that he uses as a case study my friend Rebecca Abou-Chedid.
Take for example, the case of Rebecca Abou-Chedid. She appears in the federal elections records as contributing to J Street’s PAC. Her occupation is listed as “consultant” for “USUS LLC.” But until recently, she was also the national political director at the Arab American Institute where she “was responsible for formulating AAI’s positions on foreign policy … and represented the Arab American community with Congress as well as the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State.” Today, Abou-Chedid is the director of outreach at the New America Foundation’s Middle East Task Force.
And blah blah onto an arguendo point about J Street’s “interlocking directorship.” This is what they call a teachable moment.
You will notice that nowhere in Lenny Ben-David’s post is there any accusation that Rebecca has taken any sort of objectionable stand or made any sort of objectionable point. And that’s because it is impossible to do so. I would wager that every journalist in Washington who writes on Middle East peace issues has had some interaction with Rebecca, as has every Hill staffer and innumerable current and former administration officials. Every single one of us will attest that Rebecca is incapable of ill will toward the Jewish people or toward Israel. Her entire professional life is devoted to peace, reconciliation, and two states. I have repeatedly marveled at how good natured she can be. Many has been the time I have felt that I’ve been too dour or pessimistic about peace in her presence, because Rebecca lives it. Anyone who has spent any time with her, any time at all, knows how true this is. And any person or organization that would disrespect her is not sincerely interested in peace.
All Ben-David does, like the cowardly racist he is, is point out that Rebecca has worked for the Arab-American Institute and now works for New America. Oh, and there’s that matter of her Lebanese name, of course. What he is trying to do is simple: scare Jews into tribal and atavistic fear against an organization that says, proudly, peace for Israel, the Palestinians and the region is in everyone’s interest. There is nothing more than that in his piece — nothing at all. It’s not the organization with support from Rebecca that has to answer for something. The organization that doesn’t have her support has to explain itself.
We Jews in this country frequently demand that our Arab-American fellow citizens denounce the radical and racist fringe in their midst. Yet they show more fortitude in doing so than we do when we’re faced with a Lenny Ben-David, someone who once worked for the premiere Israel-U.S. lobby group and even for the Israeli embassy. Every Jew who knows Rebecca — knows the goodness in her heart and her soul and the relentlessness with which she works to make peace a reality — must denounce Lenny Ben-David. I’ll go first, and very eagerly:
Lenny Ben-David, you and I will meet someday, face to face. I hope it comes very soon. I promise you it will be an unforgettable experience.



7 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
“The difference between a moral man and a man of honor is that the latter regrets a discreditable act, even when it has worked and he has not been caught.”
–HL Mencken
Sounds like Rebecca is a stand up person. Focused on a peaceful resolution.
Unlike many of the individuals who lied us into an immoral war and continue to fuel Islamophobia
http://www.counterpunch.org/christison09062004.html
Dual Loyalties
The Bush Neocons and Israel
By KATHLEEN and BILL CHRISTISON
Former CIA political analysts
[Editors' Note: This is a slightly revised version of essay that originally appeared in CounterPunch in December 2002. The piece also appeared in The Politics of Anti-Semitism.]
Since the long-forgotten days when the State Department’s Middle East policy was run by a group of so-called Arabists, U.S. policy on Israel and the Arab world has increasingly become the purview of officials well known for tilting toward Israel. From the 1920s roughly to 1990, Arabists, who had a personal history and an educational background in the Arab world and were accused by supporters of Israel of being totally biased toward Arab interests, held sway at the State Department and, despite having limited power in the policymaking circles of any administration, helped maintain some semblance of U.S. balance by keeping policy from tipping over totally toward Israel. But Arabists have been steadily replaced by their exact opposites, what some observers are calling Israelists, and policymaking circles throughout government now no longer even make a pretense of exhibiting balance between Israeli and Arab, particularly Palestinian, interests.
And, yes, Spencer. Lenny is a racist. But his racism is not limited to Arab Americans, not by a long shot.
Thank you, Spencer. I am sorry this happened to your friend.
I look forward to hearing about Lenny’s unforgettable experience meeting you.
You may think that you are lucky to know Ms Abou-Chedid, but I believe she is lucky to have a friend like you, Spencer. The post is a very gallant and manly gesture.
I was very tickled to read this post earlier, and I would love to watch you school Lenny.
How dare you besmerch Bob Novak! Novak, renouced his Jewness and saw Israel for the apartheid state that it is — see, for instance, http://tr.im/CBaw and http://tr.im/CBaQ. Novak was not held back by his birth as a Jew, and really saw, as we all do, that Israel is the source of much evil – and that the only answer is a one-state solution. As for Eleanor Roosenfelt, she is as much a part of the problem in the creation of the Zionist entity as Botha was in creating the Aparheid state of South Africa! Historians have long noted her strong support for the State of Israel — from even before Harry Truman agreed to the enslavement of the Palistinean people by the European colonists. See, eg, http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/shofar/v024/24.3mart.html
I’m not sure why you are mixing things up — clearly Novak was a hero – who saw, as we do, that the Arab American Institute and the New American Foundation and the International Solidarity Movement and Hamas and Hezbollah are all apart of the armies of liberation who will send the Jews back to where they belong – so that the Palistineans can once and for all be liberated.
Why American liberals feel the need to canonize Mrs. Roosefelt, when the blood of millions of dead and displaced Arabs are on her hands, is a continuation of the colonial racism that is inherent in the limosuine liberal wine & cheese crowd who permeate the dilletante websites such as this one.
Liberation Now and Liberation Forever!
الله أكبر.
If this is an attempt at humor, you have failed. If it isn’t, you’re worse than Lenny Ben-David.