It’s the 30th anniversary of the Tehran embassy seizure. The Iranian dissidents are out in the streets. But they’re not condemning U.S. imperialism. They’re condemning the brutality and avarice of the Iranian regime, and reclaiming their revolution. And they’re risking life and limb to do it.
At one point, one crowd of protesters turned its message toward the American President Barack Obama, chanting, “Obama, Obama, You are either with us or with them.”
Now, luckily for us in the U.S., there are Iranian organizations that support the dissidents and raise awareness about them, like Trita Parsi’s National Iranian-American Council or Hadi Ghaemi’s International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran. Yet over the last several days, journalists like the Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg have shrugged at the differences between Parsi and the Iranian regime. The Washington Post’s Jackson Diehl has called the opposition “unlovely” because it’s made up of Iranians, who possess an Iranian agenda, not an American neoconservative one. Great timing, gentlemen. You couldn’t be doing Ahmedinejad’s work for him any more thoroughly if he paid you. Not that I’m accusing him of paying you, of course. I have no evidence of that.
Login Here




13 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
Great post, Spencer. Thank you.
Neocons: America’s gift to Ahmedinejad.
One could do worse today than to watch the free Hulu presentation of Rick Steves’ visit to Iran. The Iranian people are a cosmopolitan and sophisticated people who could be strong allies for America if we could just get over ourselves and stop demonizing them.
http://tinyurl.com/kjv4gt
What are the odds that Trita Parsi’s National Iranian-American Council is on CIA payroll?
“Late last year, Congress agreed to a request from President Bush to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran, according to current and former military, intelligence, and congressional sources.”
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/07/080707fa_fact_hersh
Cheney wanted to put U.S. Navy Seals in fake Iranian boats in the Strait of Hormuz, and “start a shootup” to get us into war.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFdgzPbtF3o
Operation Ajax:
“The CIA operation to overthrow Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh was motivated by oil but sold to the public as an attempt to stop the Iranian Communist Tudeh Party.”
“Kermit Roosevelt, assisted by General Schwarzkopf (who had helped to train the Shah’s secret police), used $100,000 in bribe money as well as propaganda leaflets to turn the tide, just when all seemed lost. Police and royalist troops, many on the CIA payroll, gained control of the streets and surrounded the Prime Minister’s heavily fortified residence.”
Read more: http://modern-us-history.suite101.com/article.cfm/kermit_roosevelt_and_the_iranian_coup_of_1953#ixzz0VuSJvLbg
Jane has a fresh cross-post for one and all: “Lessons Learned in VA and NJ: Is Rahm Emanuel Orchestrating 2010 Democratic Massacre?”
Do you consider the Wall Street Journal a reliable source on news concerning enemies of the US?
Heaven forfend American conservatives back the play of local actors on the ground. Iran: It’s NY23 All Over Again!
Quite small, actually. If you are as well-informed as you think you are, that should be obvious.
Is it also obvious that Chalabi and the Iraqi National Congress were also free of American influence?
Give me supporting evidence for why I should believe that an Iranian American organization which supports the same overthrow in Iran as the Military Industrial Complex and AIPAC, would not be funded by these interests.
Do these Iranian Americans really think that an overthrow in Iran will result in a Utopian democracy in Iran, free of C.I.A., Neocon, and ultimately Israeli influence?
Surely they are not so naive.
Do these Iranian Americans think harsh sanctions against Iran are a good idea? How did that work out in Iraq? 400,000 children died, and Saddam was strengthened. The middle class left the country, and Iraq was ripe for a foreign takeover of the whole country, with a puppet in charge.
So show me why I should believe they are not funded by our Neocon establishment. What information am I ignorant of?
But a U.S. sponsored overthrow of a legitimate Iranian government worked so well LAST time!
Rather amusing to read. Apparently admitting that there is not one neocon who has ever actually worked for a living is taboo. They are all parasites.
Any neocon front man is automatically on the CI lying A’s payroll. Hell, Castro has run Cuba for 50+ years and the CI lying A still pays and protects the “anti” Castro thugs.
Deal with reality, if every single neocon dropped dead tomorrow there would be absolutely no change. They are parasites. They are, also, a tiny tiny tiny fraction of all americans. The only reason that they are not laughed into oblivion is that their lords and masters own all of the propaganda organs. Some fools label these organs as “news.”
Hell, even NPR is a neocon front. Their front person, I think the ombudsman, is calling for more right wingers on NPR. I don’t think there are any people who are not already with the right at NPR. Jeez, what does she want Liz Cheney?
Have you bothered reading anything about Trita Parsi and the attacks on him on this blog or are you just a troll? For fuck’s sake, the controversy is over neocon attacks on Parsi and NIAC for not supporting military intervention and harsh sanctions on Iran! Goldfarb, Goldberg, and other AIPAC allies don’t like the fact that Parsi and NIAC are not another Chalabi and Iraqi National Congress and not allies of the neoconservatives.
Read the goddamn posts before commenting on them, you lazy, ignorant troll!
We won’t have any kind of useful relationship with Iran until we stop filtering everything through our policy goals and imagined national interest. Iran is Iran, not “our ally” or “our bulwark against Communism” or “our” anything.
If we had recognized this fact all along, we would have seen that the Shah was out for himself first and Iran second and out for us not at all. Trying to pretend otherwise did nothing but hurt us. We ended up with the worst of all possible outcomes: we never had any real influence over Imperial Iranian policy, yet ordinary Iranians believe we controlled it and blame us for its evils.