Want to go deep into the bureaucratic chokepoints that failed to stop — for seemingly good reason, maddeningly enough — Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab from boarding Northwest Airlines flight 253? Beware, because this is going to get very bureaucratic.
Here’s a post about the actual procedures State has to go through to unilaterally revoke a visa. The bottom line: they simply don’t realistically allow consular officers to do that. What’s supposed to happen — and did happen, in Abdulmutallab’s case — is that State reports concerns like the one provided by Abdulmutallab’s father to a database run by TIDE out of the National Counterterrorism Center. But!
Daddy Mutallab’s information just wasn’t specific enough to do anything with, according to a U.S. intelligence official. The standard for passing such information along to a more-punitive database — one that would have compelled State to revoke Abdulmutallab’s visa and land him on the no-fly list — is “specific derogatory information leading to reasonable suspicion” of involvement in terrorism. Dad’s information doesn’t make the grade. If the standard sinks to that level, the official told me, “We’d probably shut down air traffic.”
These are going to be some fun congressional hearings.



5 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
You know what? Getting a visa to come to the US is not a right, it is a priviledge. Revoking one should not be that hard. Now I realize that makes every business person who want to travel tothe US hostage to any nut who wants to slander him.
But iti should not be that hard to cnacel a visa.
Secondly, this guy had the flag from his dad + paid for his ticket in cash + had no luggage, cumultivley, should that have been enough?
Also, I have a question fo any chemistry folks who might be lurking:
Would the airport screening machines that blast you with a puff of air and then “sniff” for explosives have caught this if used?
Whould it catch it if the next guy mules the explosives ina body cavity instead of his undies?
This “we’d shut down air travel” if it were done differently line is ass covering BS. First, there has to be some profiling involved–this idea that my mother should be screened the same way as a Nigerian Muslim who has spent time in Yemen is beyond ridiculous. Obama has the credibility to bring some realism to this, and if doesn’t the more fool he.
Yes sure, procedures need to change to adapt to the innovations by AQ, but that needs to be weighed against how much reasonably free air travel is necessary to the wellbeing of the US.
As long as incidence rates don’t go up from Nate Silver’s figures, I’d say the US is doing quite well – and I’d be happy with Scott’s suggestion. Money will clearly be better spent on reducing the supply side factors of student radicalisation.
Oh, and appoint a TSA head already.
fixed that for ya.
Are you listening, Jim deMint?
What exogenous information do you have that TIDE doesn’t already focus on Muslims? Or is this an assumption of yours?