Mark Millar is a comics god with a big problem: While madly popular, his work borders on racist and is definitely sexist. His popularity is part of a disturbing industry standard that rewards bombastic boy wonder talent, and ignores the stuff that insults a considerable portion of their demographic.
Millar is the writers’ equivalent of Rob Liefield in the 90s: A hugely influential, over-styled, larger-than-life crusader for comics in the mainstream. Liefield’s ornate costuming and overly muscled macho men informed a generation of pencillers and even landed him in a Spike Lee-directed Levi’s commercial. Millar’s deft characterizations and tightly crafted noir, superhero and adventure capers are also highly influential and have garnered mainstream success. He has produced critically lauded work for DC, WildStorm, Image and Marvel. Millar has attracted top artistic talent to Millarworld, his creator-owned comics line. Wanted and now Kick-Ass have been adapted for film. But whether Millar deserves the success is questionable.
It’s no wonder he’s a superstar. Millar writes stories that are inspirational for ostracized fanboys everywhere. In Millar’s world, the average underdog comes out on top; it’s fanboy wish fulfillment written to a perfect T. Wimpy office workers wake up to become millionaire assassins. Skinny, pimpled, high school fanboys can actually kick ass and get famous via YouTube, once they don a mask. The problem is these heroic journeys make no room for women or people of color.
There’s much more, True Believer, after the jump!
What about the fangirls?
The key term here is fanboy. Millar is completely unable to write comics that give female characters agency. From his mainstream to independent work, Millar loves putting baby in the corner. Spoiler alert: no woman in a Millar-penned story is in control of her destiny. It’s disheartening to be a female fan when comics that demean female characters are considered the creme de la creme of the industry.
As comics writer Gail Simone noticed in her famous “women in refrigerators” argument from 1999:
“…How women are treated in comics stories is ultimately part of many larger issues. But just focusing on comics – if most major women characters are eventually cannon fodder of one type or another, how does that affect the female readers? Do they give up?
“Combine this trend with the bad girl comics and you have a very weird, slightly hostile environment for women down at the friendly comics shoppe. No, I’m not against cheesecake or sexual content in comics, but when that content is strictly for boys and the women are just bizarre centerfolds with fangs and big hair … well, it starts to smell like a guy’s locker room.”
Millar’s last work for DC, Superman: Red Son, is a perfect example. Baby Supes crash lands on a collective farm in rural Ukraine instead of Kansas. He becomes an instrument of Stalin and is corrupted by his desire to save humanity from itself. It’s a cool political concept and a decent read…until the women come into play. Millar takes two of the strongest, most independent female characters in comics history and completely humiliates them. Lois Lane is married to Lex Luthor, who delights in manipulating her. When Luthor closes down the Daily Planet but saves its competitor, Lane muses that it’s because Luthor “knows I loved this newspaper with all my heart and he can’t stand the idea of me loving anything except him.”
Things are worse for Wonder Woman, a feminist icon and established Grade-A warrior in the DC Universe. She moons after Superman like a sick puppy, then sacrifices her integrity in order to save his life. As a result, she is physically scarred and unable to speak for months. Her powers are detroyed and she becomes a vengeful hag. But her subjugation only serves to add drama for Superman’s story. We don’t hear one word of how the experience effected and shaped the Amazonian princess. She’s silenced, and Superman can only imagine what her pain must have been like.
Even worse in the indie leagues
Millar’s experience writing Red Son soured his relationship with DC. The company censored the more violent, grandiloquent aspects of Millar’s work and toned it down for mainstream audiences. DC’s conservatism may have been a good thing. Wanted and Kick-Ass, which were published through independent imprints of publishers Marvel and Image, are rife with sexist, homophobic and racist sentiment that is often played off for laughs.
In terms of race, Millar carelessly tosses nationalities and races around as a means of supporting a character’s masculinity (or lack thereof). Kick-Ass protagonist Dave Lizewski rises to fame after a video of him beating up a group of men that are only referred to as “Puerto Ricans” blows up on YouTube. Dave’s other early adversaries also include stereotypical black gangsters and their ‘hos. Insult to injury: those level-one baddie aren’t even as intimidating as the white mafiosi boss that Dave and Hit-Girl face during the book’s climax.
Wanted‘s Wesley Gibson hates his supervisor, a black woman, who makes him feel like less of a man. As he narrates his day: “This is me taking shit from my African American boss. As you can see, I’m smiling as she insults me because I’m embarrassed by the situation and more than a little afraid of the scary fucking bitch.” Dave and Wesley are both wimpy white boys with blond bedhead. Dave becomes famous because he asserts his might over a bunch of stereotypical gang-bangers. Wesley is a pansy because he’s afraid of a black woman, and it’s supposed to be hilarious. Millar assumes that his readers can identify because they must be downtrodden fanboys too.
Millar does have defenders — though their logic is flawed. Douglas Wolk argues, unconvincingly, that Millar’s grotesque, flawed characters are part of the point. According to Wolk, Millar is holding up a mirror for fanboys, saying “This is awesome, … and by the way, what does thinking it’s awesome say about you, fanboy?” But Wolk gives Millar too much credit. There’s badassery for badassery’s sake, and then there’s just bullshit.
Case in point is Hit-Girl, the 10 and 1/4 year old superhero assassin that steals the show in Kick-Ass. Hit-Girl’s got the hottest moves, the best lines, and is the deadliest crusader in the book. She saves Dave’s life in her first appearance, and he describes her as “…John Rambo meets Polly Pocket. Dakota Fanning crossed with Death Wish 4. She handled those knives like a fucking surgeon. I still can’t believe she was only 10.” She is the definition of Bad. Ass. Hit-Girl saves Dave several times over. Throughout the entire book, she is smarter, faster and more capable than any other costumed bro, including her father.
But, when the battle is done, Hit-Girl hangs up her cowl in favor of a normal life. This isn’t bad, in and of itself. The character should be able to do what she wants. What’s damaging is how Millar interprets the 10 year old’s retirement: “She finally got to all the things little girls were supposed to do and never raised her hand in violence again.” Ouch. That’s a big fuck-you to heroines everywhere. The most capable hero is retired to a domestic life because she was abnormal, but Dave continues on his costumed adventures and is a role model for fanboys everywhere.
Of course it’s not all golden for Dave. After pretending to be gay to get closer to his crush Katie, Dave comes clean and bares his heart. Instead of getting romantic, Katie calls Dave a creep, then texts him a picture of her blowing her black boyfriend. For all his costumed prowess and good intention, Dave can’t get laid because women are just bitches who want a big dick. And all we learn about Katie’s boyfriend, Carl is that he’s black and can kick Dave’s ass.
The industry needs to step it up
Millar is hardly the only writer to torture female characters to make things more dramatic for the male heroes. We experience the guilt and anguish of the male hero over the damsels distress, but are never immersed in the woman’s perspective. The story is always told through a male lens. Millar’s continued success is problematic because it underscores the industry’s disinterest in inclusivity. Non-white and women audiences don’t make the cut. It’s a pity. Comics are a great social equalizer: You don’t have to have a college degree to love them and talk about them. It would be brilliant if the content matched the potential.
Erin Polgreen is a Senior Program Associate for The Media Consortium. She is also an incurable comics fan. She tweets and blogs.



10 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
I’ve never read any of Millar’s comics, but given my experience with the comics industry as a whole I’m not surprised to hear about his retrograde attitudes towards characters of color and women. Sadly, he seems to be continuing the tradition of pandering to the poor pathetic, geeky white fanboys and ignoring that women and people of color also want to be included, to feel like superheroes, to do great things!
Speaking of inclusion, however, I take issue with your use of the word “lame” to describe Millar. It’s an ableist term that reinforces the idea that not being able to walk (i.e. being literally lame) is bad. I agree that Millar’s work appears to be quite problematic from your analysis here, but the word “lame” is inappropriate. Thanks!
Oh my God I hope the second paragraph of the first comment is a joke. Shouldn’t make me a kneejerk anti-P.C.er to point out how crazy it sounds.
I find a lot of what is said here to be enlightening and interesting but I must respectfully disagree, a little. I enjoy Millar’s writing the same way I enjoy Grant Morrison’s writing because Millar likes to play with the peculiar nature and physics of comic book universes. A lot of his material, for instance (this would include Wanted) is based on the notion that due to the conventions of monthly publishing, there has to be multiple villains for every solo superhero book, to the point where there are like 20 Spider-Man villains for every Spider-Man. So Millar wrote several books asking the question, well, wouldn’t it make sense if all of these villains teamed up and killed all the superheroes around?
In the same vein, I view a lot of his work as taking the insane and rather retrograde conventions of superhero material and amplifying them to both their most logical and absurd conclusions. In the case of Kick-Ass and his treatment of women, I agree with Wolk that he isn’t race-baiting more than he is pointing to a long fanboy tradition of doing the same. It all comes down to the male-oriented universes that Millar is a part of, so wouldn’t it make sense that, in these universes, men would act appallingly.
There are a lot of aspects of Millar’s work I find silly (he claims that a book with a ten-year old assassin who lays waste to dozens of mobsters is the “first book about what superheroes would be like in the real world”–not likely), but frankly the amount of Internet hate I see directed toward him and Bendis reflects a rather retrograde, fanboyish view of comics in itself.
I may have misread Wesley’s hatred for his African American boss in Wanted, when you put it like this it was almost as if Millar was using it as an insult but he didn’t want to write what he really wanted to write. What did you think of the Fox character in Wanted? They lightened her up a great deal in the movie but he didn’t pull the same thing with her that he did with hit-girl.
I’m by no means a fan of Mark Millar’s work, but equating his characters with his personal views is a pretty faulty statement.
My problem with Millar is pretty aligned to Wolk’s interpretation (which you didn’t really argue against as much as just totally disregard): Millar’s characters are horrible people and Millar thinks all comic book people are horrible, if they empathize with them. Weasley Gibson is a rapist, murderer and supervillain. If you empathize with that, you’re insane. The last page of Wanted is a giant “fuck you” to the reader. Ultimates is nothing, but a long critique of Michael Bay’esque superheroics. His Authority continues the strain, that Warren Ellis introduced, being that the protagonists are fucking fascists.
As much as I love superheroes and think they’ve evolved away from it, the very idea that “complex issues can be solved by punching something till it’s the way you want it” is a very fascist idea.
I dislike Millar’s work because A. it seems to get misunderstood as an approval, which Millar seemingly doesn’t care about as long as it sells and B. all his characters are monsters. But to call him a homophobe, racist or misogynist, because some of the characters are these things is an incredibly wrong assessment. Der Untergang portrays Hitler and some of his cohorts in a somewhat sympathetic light- Does that mean the makers of the film are nazis?
PS. Regarding the question of “lame”- Firstly, I would argue that it’s evolved past that definition a long time ago, much like “basket case”, a person who can be carried around in a basket, because their arms and legs were blown off, and secondly, I would imagine not being able to walk was a pretty terrible thing. So I doubt anyone with this particular disability would be against using it as a derogatory term.
I love the passion with which you wrote this post. I haven’t read any of Mark Millar’s work but am aware of the struggle women characters face in the comic world.
Although I am not a die hard comic fan the lack of strong female characters is part of the reason I created a web series centered around a young woman who dreams of being a superhero. I wanted to explore this pop culture phenomenon that inspires so many fanboys and fangirls.
I’ve realized for a while now there’s no point in trying to get people to adjust their artistic expressions to serve my views of balancing the representation of women or minorities. So I’m just going to be one of the chicks who goes out there and creates those characters you’ve expressed wanting to see, cause I want to see them too.
We hope to turn our web series CHICK into a comic at some point. CHICK is a small step for me/us but at least it’s a step. What we need to do is keep creating strong, female characters in the comic world and elsewhere and prove there’s an audience for them. Because at the end of the day it’s all about making a profit for these companies. No one argues with $$$! :)
Out of curiousity, can you recommend some comics to read that better represent women?
Thanks for the informative read.
Political reviews are, sadly, usually this bad. In general assessing a work based on who it ISN’T about seems like a pretty faulty approach. And you might want to re-examine the scene in Kick-Ass 8 in which our plucky, 10-year-old proto-feminist heroine Hit-Girl snorts cocaine before her big fight scene. Real tragedy she quit the life, huh?
I agree that comics definitely have race and sexism issues. completely. Mark Millar being one of the main examples is an exaggeration. Millar’s characters are flawed, like someone already mentioned, both wanted and kick-ass makes fun of the fanboy while giving him what he wants. the fanboy’s own jacked up views play a huge part of that. it’s just one more reason why kick-ass is good.
also the reduce his other work, especially the ultimates, to just action trash is missing the point. I still think his spin on Thor is just perfect for a team based on 21st century america. I;ll give u that female characters in that book weren’t as prominent as they could have been. Although I thought he handled the wasp/pym/cap relationship pretty interestingly. making janet and hank’s classicly jacked up relationship seem more human and even more messed up. not hiding the darkness of it has it had been done for years. and showing people what they were truly accepting when they were ok with jan and hank being together.
i also bring up his run on Fantastic Four. in the case of Valeria richards who before him was just some googley eyed toddler, and now is possibly smarter than her father. or his entire handling of the Invisible Woman. which ultimately leads to the entire team taking down doom and not just mr. fantastic.
as for racism I’ve never thought of it as that. honest in regards to the characters he’s writing than yes. people say things like what wesley and david did about minorities. is it right? no, is it human? yes and i;m not admonishing it, just saying that maybe that;s part of the point he’s making. the same thing with ultimate cap and the generation he’s from who’s always portrayed as perfect, but never shown how they ignored huge issues of sex and race during that time. ultimate cap is kinda of a racist/sexist badass jerk cause that was what america was at the time. and there’s good and bad things to that. i would agree with u maybe, if there wasn’t his portrayal of nick fury. who was clearly the guy in charge.
or what about is ultimate xmen run. where jean grey finally who has always been portrayed as cyclops eternal maiden in distress was definitely turned to a total bad-ass. and is still the best interpretation of jean.
so yeah comics have these flaws but mark millar is the least of the creators that should be examined.
or what about is ultimate xmen run. where jean grey finally who has always been portrayed as cyclops eternal maiden in distress was definitely turned to a total bad-ass. and is still the best interpretation of jean.
Yep. That’s sure what I remember most about Jean in the main universe. The Dark Phoenix Arc, for example, was ALL about Cyclops saving the day. Yep.
(She totally didn’t, in contrast, psychically yank Apocalypse out of HIS head when the situation was flipped either.)
nsacks — Here’s the thing. The original poster pointed out that Wonder Woman’s behavior is very un-Wonder Womanlike. She attaches to Superman at the expense of her principles, then goes Medea on him. Lois Lane allows Luther to humiliate her and rob her of everything she values. That’s not Wonder Woman or Lois Lane seen that way through a misogynistic character’s eyes, that’s a misogynistic portrayal of Wonder Woman and Lois Lane. That’s from the writer, not the character.
And in Kick-Ass, all of the people of color are victims or bad guys. That’s not a racist CHARACTER, that’s a racist WORLD. He’s set this up from the ground up.
kross29 — Wow, I so totally disagree on you on everything Ultimates (except for Thor, that was a brilliant idea.)
And no offense, but saying Jean Grey “always been portrayed as cyclops eternal maiden in distress” translates to me as “I have never read any X-Men other than Ultimate X-Men.” Check out your Essentials, she’s pretty badass even early on under the notorious Stan Lee. She gets better from there. All Millar did with the character was use her as jailbait for a very icky portrayal of Wolverine.
Don’t forget the creepy implications with Ultimate Xavier.
Ultimate Jean eventually improved a bit, but when she started she was the absolute worst of the X-Men revamps. And that’s even including the fact that he turned Storm, STORM, into a two-bit car-jacking hoodlum. (Sure 616′s Storm had a criminal past too, but it was a lot less important to her character than the whole goddess thing.)