The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe.
An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and Blackberries.
So if you were still operating on the presumption that the real reason we remain at war after nine years is something to do with the world’s least efficient way to establish and control an oil pipeline, you’re so 2000-and-late. What, you thought it was a coincidence that the Center for a New American Security established its natural-resources/defense program so soon after the first wave of its leadership entered the Obama Pentagon and State Department? It’s a shame we can’t manufacture cellphone batteries from your vast deposits of naivete.
But I digress. This could potentially work out well for Afghanistan’s opium-and-foreign-aid dependent economy. But Risen details the ways in which the so-called “resource curse” is primed to take effect after the discovery: massive official corruption; weak legal understandings controls delineating ownership and revenue-sharing between national and provincial authorities in mineral-rich areas; decades of warfare. And now, naturally, someone’s telling Risen about the specter of great-power resource competition that just so perfectly implies a new rationale for extended war and post-war foreign influence:
American officials fear resource-hungry China will try to dominate the development of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth, which could upset the United States, given its heavy investment in the region. After winning the bid for its Aynak copper mine in Logar Province, China clearly wants more, American officials said.
Hey, just because something aligns with a conspiracy theory doesn’t mean it lacks geopolitical impact.



6 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Hoo boy. So are we armwrestling the Chinese for this stuff?
Vast amounts of valuable resources in a politically unstable country has sure worked out well for the DRC, Sierra Leone and Angola! I bet that the international community will allow these deposits to better the lives and livelihoods of all Afghans and that the Afghan warlords (gov’t and opposition) will come together to share the bounty that the earth has to offer, thus eliminating the poppy trade and introducing a new age of prosperity.
I can’t wait!
Got to agree with Sean here; there are very few countries, developed or developing, who have made a success out of exploiting newly discovered mineral wealth, the wealth always seems to end up with corrupt rulers, corporations (usually foreign) and/or other countries, it very rarely benefits the people.
Even the UK has managed to fritter away its North Sea oil revenues on tax cuts and is going to have little left to show for it, the only ones getting rich have been the oil majors. The one big exception is Norway, they have managed their oil wealth particularly well.
Also rom a geological point of view it’s been known for a long time that Afghanistan would likely have substantial mineral deposits, the trick is locating them.
In a previous life I fact-checked a piece about rentier states & Iraq. Norway was the only exception to the rule that resources are more curse than blessing amongst states with relatively recent resource discoveries.
You left out a few details about this brilliant collection of establishment neo-con policy makers. The Board of advisors has Stephen Friedman, AIG crook, Goldman Sachs crook, Federal Reserve crook, who runs the Phony Wars On Terror through the FIAB. There is Micheal O’Hanlon lying warmonger and chickenhawk. The Board of Directors has Libby co-conspirator and PNAC warmonger Richard Armitage. William Perry is also one of these quiet neo-cons that infest these national security institutions.
But they do have a few “liberals” for diversity. But of course no disresepectful bloggers who might embarrass the the self appointed policy makers of the Empire. This group of oligarchs should be called “neo-con veal pen”.
I guess on one hand it’s better than the drugs they grow, but sure does bring into questions how long our gov has known.