Spider-Man is basically the story of a working class kid from Queens who was raised by a non-traditional family. Despite his superheroics and academic striving, he has endless beef with the cops, a ballbusting boss who cheats him out of his rightful pay, an elderly aunt to take care of and at non-negotiable financial commitments to meet at the age of 16. Anyone who has ever lived in a working class neighborhood in New York, regardless of ethnic background, knows this kid.
One of the important things about Spider-Man is he never really makes it comfortably into the middle class. I suppose it’s understandable that a comic-book movie is going to want to cater to a teenage audience, but Peter Parker’s teenage years end pretty early in the comic. What lasts a long time is Peter’s college and grad school years, and they’re followed by 30 to 40 years of being 23-34. All that time, he’s got student loans to pay off, but the Daily Bugle never puts him properly on staff, so he’s stuck as a freelance photographer, despite being a brilliant scientist. His wife is an underemployed actress. New York City is expensive, so between him and MJ, they’re going to keep renting apartments just this side of seedy. He’s world-famous as a superhero, but one of his major enemies is the Con Ed bill.
And it’s important. Heroes like the teenage Spider-Man or the Thing or Jean Grey or the Falcon taught low-income and minority kids in urban environments that they should be just as proud as themselves as the kids who resembled Tony Stark or Bruce Wayne or Steve Rogers. Spider-Man went further. It added the reality that your twenties won’t necessarily be a time when you resolve your financial situation. The opportunities you get might force you to choose between how you want to live your life and how you need to pay bills. Or you might not get the opportunities you want — or deserve — at all.
I don’t think I was mature enough as a teenager to really grasp the message that the late-20s Peter Parker was trying to teach me back then. But it sunk in on me very quickly as a post-collegiate journalist making in the low $20,000s while living in an expensive city. The answer isn’t to stop doing what you want in life. That’s the challenge. There’s no answer. And it won’t get easier. (That realization also explains why Angel is a better show than Buffy.)



5 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Great post, though I’m not sure about the Angel/Buffy comparison. Seasons 4-7 of Buffy are all about the sort of thing you’re describing – Buffy has to get a job at a fast food restaurant, Anya starts running the magic shop, Xander comes to terms with his career options, etc. Or are you just referring to the explicitly thematic grappling with destiny and purpose that Angel does on his show?
Also, want to give you props – any blog that writes a post about Spiderman that references Whedon shows while at the same time exhaustively covering terrorism and national security is an automatic candidate for best choices in posting topics in my book.
Hear, hear!
Thanks for the kind words, and fair point on Buffy — though maybe it should be said that season 6 of Buffy is the 1st that really shows her having to live her (resurrected) life as an adult. (As when Giles tells her, “You have to figure out what you’re going to do. With your life.”) And while I’m a season 6 apologist, the consensus is that it wasn’t so good. But fair point.
There’s also some stuff in S5 after *spoiler* Joyce dies about dealing with the consequences of being forced to take responsibility for one’s own actions without a safety net to protect you, though it’s less about professionalism than being a (surrogate) parent and the special responsibilities entailed by that situation. In some ways, the central “death is your gift” theme could be seen as describing the degree of self-sacrifice required adulthood, particularly parenthood. But you’re right that S6 is the most explicit on this point (ironically, given that I brought up S6 to defend Buffy, I’m not a huge S6 fan).
Actually, now that I know you’re a Buffy/Angel fan, I should mention that I’m writing a post on Angel and foreign policy doctrines for a different blog – I can send it your way if you’re interested.
@zbeaucha
fwiw, I would be interested in reading that post. Do you have a link to that blog? Even if that post isnt up yet I am intrigued by a place where that idea would come up.