I always thought that Mark Danner was the first to coin the term “The Forever War” in his 2005 essay on the post-9/11 world, “Taking Stock of the Forever War.” Then Dexter Filkins wrote a great book with that title. But now my sci-fi ignorance is on full display: via Tom Ricks, it seems that The Forever War was a 70s-era novel about the struggle between humanity and the Taurans:
Humans first bumped heads with the Taurans when we began using collapsars to travel the stars. Although the collapsars provide nearly instantaneous travel across vast distances, the relativistic speeds associated with the process means that time passes slower for those aboard ship. For William Mandella, a physics student drafted as a soldier, that means more than 27 years will have passed between his first encounter with the Taurans and his homecoming, though he himself will have aged only a year. When Mandella finds that he can’t adjust to Earth after being gone so long from home, he reenlists, only to find himself shuttled endlessly from battle to battle as the centuries pass.
Yeah, I would love this. But the proliferation of Forever Wars, in prose as in reality, remains unsettling.



6 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Joe Haldeman, I own a copy.
As long as there’s a profit motive in forever war, capitalists will engage in it.
You should absolutely read The Forever War, Spencer: it’s one of the all-time classic SF takes on warfare and its effects.
It’s helpful although not at all necessary to read “Starship Troopers” first: Haldeman was a Vietnam veteran, and wrote The Forever War as a fierce riposte to Heinlein’s cheerily optimistic militarism.
I don’t feel so bad. I made the same mistake as well when I heard that Tom Ricks was reading “The Forever War”.
Yes, read the Haldeman Forever War
This incredible book is still fantastically prescient considering that it explores issues such as gays in the military, women serving in the front lines, etc. and so on.
In the days leading up to the 2008 election, there was talk it was supposed to be made into a movie but since it deals with how ‘forever’ war is, that talk has since disappeared. Maybe folks might see it and become more opposed to our endless involvement in wars. Oddly enough, this same fate happened to Robert Heinlein’s “The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress” at the time of the 2004 election — a book about using a computer to steal an election.