BACK IN D.C. — Via Juan Cole, Nouri al-Maliki clarifies his intentions for U.S. troops in a Wall Street Journal interview:
‘ WSJ: Some American officials have spoken about contingency plans being drawn now in Washington for the possibility that some American troops will stay after 2011. Do you know about these contingency plans, and do you need troops?
Mr. Maliki: I do not care about what’s being said. I care about what’s on paper and what has been agreed to. The withdrawal of forces agreement [Status of Forces Agreement or SOFA] expires on Dec. 31, 2011. The last American soldier will leave Iraq.
Secondly this agreement is sealed and at the time we designated it as sealed and not subject to extension, except if the new government with Parliament’s approval wanted to reach a new agreement with America, or another country, that’s another matter. This agreement is not subject to extension, not subject to alteration, it is sealed, it expires on Dec. 31 [2011]. ‘
“The last American soldier” probably exempts trainers for Iraqi pilots and other residual elements. But if anything, this reads like Maliki warning the Obama administration not to make any requests. And since Obama will need to cite the end of the Iraq war as an accomplishment during his reelection campaign, that probably amounts to an alignment of political interests.



2 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About ATTACKERMAN
RSS/XML Feed
Whats this shit, Spencer? Aiding and abetting the witch-hunt?
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/29/wired_1/index.html
Not exactly.
from CRS:
While an “agreement on a long term relationship” ought to be a treaty and be subject to Senate advice and consent according to the Constituion, this was not done despite congressional pleas. The House held some hearings without the benefit of presidential cooperation, the Senate in late 2008 under the control of Obama/Biden didn’t. On the Iraqi side there was considerable review and debate.
So it is only an executive agreement and not a treaty, which makes it easier to change. It’s yet another expansion of executive privilege.
A SOFA is normally merely an agreement that defines the legal position of a visiting military force deployed in the territory of a friendly state.
This “SOFA” agreement is not actually a SOFA. It is actually, as PM Maliki says, a withdrawal of forces agreement. It is entitled “Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States Forces from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq” (extracts follow)
Then there’s the Strategic Framework Agreement
Strategic Framework Agreement for a Relationship of Friendship and Cooperation between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq (extracts)
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/national/iraq-strategic-framework-agreement.htm